From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Shaiq Wani <shaiq.wani@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] common/idpf: enable AVX2 for single queue Rx
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:48:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5pb4umxKg9adtQH@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250129121856.1040065-2-shaiq.wani@intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 05:48:54PM +0530, Shaiq Wani wrote:
> In case some CPUs don't support AVX512. Enable AVX2 for them to
> get better per-core performance.
>
> The single queue model processes all packets in order while
> the split queue model separates packet data and metadata into
> different queues for parallel processing and improved performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaiq Wani <shaiq.wani@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_device.h | 1 +
> drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx.h | 4 +
> drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx2.c | 485 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/common/idpf/meson.build | 9 +
> drivers/common/idpf/version.map | 1 +
> drivers/net/idpf/idpf_rxtx.c | 11 +
This patch needs a rebase onto next-net-intel to update this final path.
See also comments inline below.
Regards,
/Bruce
> 6 files changed, 511 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx2.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_device.h b/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_device.h
> index bfa927a5ff..734be1c88a 100644
> --- a/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_device.h
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ struct idpf_vport {
>
> bool rx_vec_allowed;
> bool tx_vec_allowed;
> + bool rx_use_avx2;
> bool rx_use_avx512;
> bool tx_use_avx512;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx.h b/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx.h
> index eeeeed12e2..f50cf5ef46 100644
> --- a/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx.h
> +++ b/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx.h
> @@ -302,5 +302,9 @@ uint16_t idpf_dp_splitq_xmit_pkts_avx512(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pk
> __rte_internal
> uint16_t idpf_dp_singleq_recv_scatter_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> uint16_t nb_pkts);
> +__rte_internal
> +uint16_t idpf_dp_singleq_recv_pkts_avx2(void *rx_queue,
> + struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts);
>
> #endif /* _IDPF_COMMON_RXTX_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx2.c b/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..de76f01ff8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/common/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,485 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + * Copyright(c) 2023 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <rte_vect.h>
> +
> +#include "idpf_common_rxtx.h"
> +#include "idpf_common_device.h"
> +
<snip>
> +idpf_dp_singleq_recv_pkts_avx2(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> +{
> + return _idpf_singleq_recv_raw_pkts_vec_avx2(rx_queue, rx_pkts, nb_pkts);
> +}
I assume the presence of this wrapper function is to allow future support
for scattered packets, as with other drivers?
> diff --git a/drivers/common/idpf/meson.build b/drivers/common/idpf/meson.build
> index 46fd45c03b..fe54fdcd87 100644
> --- a/drivers/common/idpf/meson.build
> +++ b/drivers/common/idpf/meson.build
> @@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ sources = files(
> )
>
> if arch_subdir == 'x86'
> + sources += files('idpf_common_rxtx.c')
This is already added to sources in the block above. It's also not x86
specific, I believe.
> + cflags += ['-DCC_AVX2_SUPPORT']
Strictly speaking, we don't need this, as we always have AVX2 support in
x86 builds. The code can just check for RTE_ARCH_x86 macro.
> + idpf_avx2_lib = static_library('idpf_avx2_lib',
> + 'idpf_common_rxtx_avx2.c',
> + dependencies: [static_rte_ethdev, static_rte_kvargs, static_rte_hash],
rte_kvargs is already a dependency of hash and ethdev libraries, so you can
drop it from the list to shorten it.
> + include_directories: includes,
> + c_args: [cflags, '-mavx2'])
> + objs += idpf_avx2_lib.extract_objects('idpf_common_rxtx_avx2.c')
> +
> if cc_has_avx512
> cflags += ['-DCC_AVX512_SUPPORT']
> avx512_args = cflags + cc_avx512_flags
> diff --git a/drivers/common/idpf/version.map b/drivers/common/idpf/version.map
> index 0729f6b912..22b689f5f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/common/idpf/version.map
> +++ b/drivers/common/idpf/version.map
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ INTERNAL {
>
> idpf_dp_prep_pkts;
> idpf_dp_singleq_recv_pkts;
> + idpf_dp_singleq_recv_pkts_avx2;
> idpf_dp_singleq_recv_pkts_avx512;
> idpf_dp_singleq_recv_scatter_pkts;
> idpf_dp_singleq_xmit_pkts;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_rxtx.c
> index 858bbefe3b..a8377d3fee 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/idpf/idpf_rxtx.c
> @@ -776,6 +776,10 @@ idpf_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> rte_vect_get_max_simd_bitwidth() >= RTE_VECT_SIMD_128) {
> vport->rx_vec_allowed = true;
>
> + if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX2) == 1 &&
> + rte_vect_get_max_simd_bitwidth() >= RTE_VECT_SIMD_256)
> + vport->rx_use_avx2 = true;
> +
> if (rte_vect_get_max_simd_bitwidth() >= RTE_VECT_SIMD_512)
> #ifdef CC_AVX512_SUPPORT
> if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX512F) == 1 &&
> @@ -827,6 +831,13 @@ idpf_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> return;
> }
> #endif /* CC_AVX512_SUPPORT */
> + if (vport->rx_use_avx2) {
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(NOTICE,
> + "Using Single AVX2 Vector Rx (port %d).",
> + dev->data->port_id);
> + dev->rx_pkt_burst = idpf_dp_singleq_recv_pkts_avx2;
> + return;
> + }
> }
>
> if (dev->data->scattered_rx) {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 12:17 [PATCH 0/2] enable AVX2 for IDPF single queue Shaiq Wani
2025-01-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] common/idpf: enable AVX2 for single queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2025-01-20 14:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-01-27 8:19 ` Wani, Shaiq
2025-01-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] enable AVX2 for single queue Rx/Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-01-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] common/idpf: enable AVX2 for single queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2025-01-29 16:48 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2025-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] enable AVX2 for single queue Rx/Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] common/idpf: enable AVX2 for single queue Rx Shaiq Wani
2025-01-30 8:21 ` David Marchand
2025-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] common/idpf: enable AVX2 for single queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-01-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] " Shaiq Wani
2025-01-29 16:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-01-29 12:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] doc: documentaion update for idpf pmd Shaiq Wani
2025-01-29 16:55 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-01-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] common/idpf: enable AVX2 for single queue Tx Shaiq Wani
2025-01-20 14:23 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-01-27 9:46 ` Wani, Shaiq
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z5pb4umxKg9adtQH@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shaiq.wani@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).