From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [24.03 RFC 0/3] Add argument manipulation library
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 18:12:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUPmo14UpFlJowcT@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231102105029.2c9eff43@fedora>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 10:50:29AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 17:28:46 +0000
> Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > DPDK has traditionally assumed that apps are written where argc/argv
> > parameters are passed directly to rte_eal_init() and then app arguments
> > are handled afterwards, as is done in the DPDK apps and examples.
> >
> > However, based on other projects, like VPP and OVS, we know that this is
> > often not the case. Instead, the apps build up argument lists internally
> > themselves and pass those to the init function, and DPDK never directly
> > accesses the real argc/argv values.
> >
> > Therefore, let's make this mode of operation a little easier to use, by
> > adding in an args library to allow an app to dynamically build up an
> > args array and then pass that to EAL init. This library allows things
> > like, for example, initializing a list from argv and then checking if a
> > particular parameter is present, adding it if not. All the basics of
> > such a library are included in patch 1, and I've found it of use myself
> > when writing some simple apps internally using DPDK.
> >
> > Patches 2 and 3 go a little further than this, and allow for a slightly
> > different use-case, that where an app may want to allow mixing of EAL
> > arguments in with app args. These patches allow the user to query if a
> > particular argument is an EAL arg or not, or a valid app argument. The
> > idea here would be, that an app could go through it's argument list,
> > building up an argument list for EAL init by just picking out the EAL
> > arguments from a full argument list. I'm less convinced of the value of
> > this compared to the basics in patch 1, but I think the idea is
> > interesting so seeking feedback on it.
> >
> > Bruce Richardson (3):
> > args: new library to allow easier manipulation of cmdline args
> > eal: allow export of the cmdline argument parsing options
> > args: add functions to check parameter validity
> >
> > doc/api/doxy-api-index.md | 1 +
> > doc/api/doxy-api.conf.in | 1 +
> > lib/args/args.c | 301 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/args/meson.build | 5 +
> > lib/args/rte_args.h | 255 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/args/version.map | 22 ++
> > lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 9 +
> > lib/eal/include/rte_eal.h | 14 ++
> > lib/eal/version.map | 1 +
> > lib/meson.build | 2 +
> > 10 files changed, 611 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 lib/args/args.c
> > create mode 100644 lib/args/meson.build
> > create mode 100644 lib/args/rte_args.h
> > create mode 100644 lib/args/version.map
> >
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
>
> It would be good to change rte_eal_init() from:
> int rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv);
>
> to
> int rte_eal_init(int argc, char * const *argv);
>
> I.e it should not modify the argv's passed.
> This would save unnecessary copy in applications that build synthetic args.
> Example already exists in dumpcap.
>
Pushed up a quick patch proposal for that:
http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20231102181148.56930-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-02 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-02 17:28 Bruce Richardson
2023-11-02 17:28 ` [24.03 RFC 1/3] args: new library to allow easier manipulation of cmdline args Bruce Richardson
2024-01-24 12:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-01-24 13:57 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-11-02 17:28 ` [24.03 RFC 2/3] eal: allow export of the cmdline argument parsing options Bruce Richardson
2023-11-02 17:28 ` [24.03 RFC 3/3] args: add functions to check parameter validity Bruce Richardson
2024-01-24 11:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-02 17:50 ` [24.03 RFC 0/3] Add argument manipulation library Stephen Hemminger
2023-11-02 18:12 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZUPmo14UpFlJowcT@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).