From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Michael Santana <maicolgabriel@hotmail.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] version: 24.03-rc0
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 14:30:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWnt_4R9XPdZbO-R@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bafd24f8-c003-453c-8335-fbd94d0c4f8c@amd.com>
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:33:25AM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/1/2023 11:13 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 09:04:10AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 30/11/2023 19:33, Patrick Robb:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:24 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> What it means:
> >>>> - for the https://dpdk.org/git/dpdk repository, all the branches and
> >>>> tags are mirrored to https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk as it was done so
> >>>> far,
> >>>> - for the https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-* repositories, only
> >>>> branches named "main", "staging" or "for-*" are mirrored to
> >>>> https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk with a prefix.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you David for clearing some of this up on the CI testing meeting. I
> >>> think the final loose end was you were wondering which branches within the
> >>> next-* repos we were running from. I'll paste that below:
> >>>
> >>> dpdk-next-crypto: for-main
> >>> dpdk-next-eventdev: for-main
> >>> dpdk-next-net: main
> >>> dpdk-next-net-brcm: main
> >>> dpdk-next-net-intel: main
> >>> dpdk-next-net-mlx: main
> >>> dpdk-next-net-mrvl: for-next-net
> >>> dpdk-next-virtio: main
> >>> dpdk-next-baseband: for-main
> >>
> >> We should test patches on top of the branch which is validated
> >> by the tree maintainer and ready to pull.
> >> This is the default branch (HEAD) of its repository on dpdk.org.
> >> This is the list of equivalent GitHub branches to use for testing:
> >>
> >> main
> >> next-baseband-for-main
> >> next-crypto-for-main
> >> next-eventdev-for-main
> >> next-net-for-main-repo
> >
> > The (slight) inconsistency here is curious. Is there a reason why this
> > branch has "repo" on the end and none of the others don't?
> >
>
> No specific reason, it started like that in the past. If the consensus
> is to go with 'for-main', I can update it.
>
In all likelihood it's not a big deal.
I'm just thinking that for any future automation or tracking, having a very
consistent naming would be best. For example, in the one-liner I posted for
generating the graph showing the inter-tree flow, I needed a special regex
to strip off the "-repo", so that we didn't have a separate target called
"main-repo" and another called "main".
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-01 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-29 16:18 David Marchand
2023-11-30 9:23 ` David Marchand
2023-11-30 9:30 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-11-30 9:32 ` David Marchand
2023-11-30 9:53 ` David Marchand
2023-11-30 10:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-11-30 18:33 ` Patrick Robb
2023-12-01 8:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-12-01 8:55 ` David Marchand
2023-12-01 10:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-12-01 10:39 ` David Marchand
2023-12-01 11:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-12-01 11:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-12-01 14:30 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2023-12-01 16:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-12-01 17:24 ` Patrick Robb
2023-12-01 17:32 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-12-01 21:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-12-01 21:24 ` Patrick Robb
2023-12-07 9:55 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWnt_4R9XPdZbO-R@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=maicolgabriel@hotmail.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).