From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B0041C2D; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:08:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD42F410DF; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:08:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CB440042 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:08:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1675764504; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eO1o0HdIzFssbuRrW596wm8IxsvcA8n3d3ec/Ia4p0I=; b=HqMgd593wqNrOyFpQCj5AU1Qj2H59p1/MZLHSP1CU1cQeXfhkDF73tf/7CGX6XC1ITWLAx 9KmVgbMaUamrXRy7ytcmjst19G1k7IFLdZk6gJd9WmPY+92NmR9sBVLL2iaTDGCkF66hgF PwiEpdpM8VbYd2q5DyH/w43dqEYaEJY= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-28-iJ2tD40bMkyEfWiMofh9AQ-1; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 05:08:23 -0500 X-MC-Unique: iJ2tD40bMkyEfWiMofh9AQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C540918E5281; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.26] (unknown [10.39.208.26]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30DE492B21; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:08:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/21] Add control queue & MQ support to Virtio-user vDPA To: "Xia, Chenbo" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "eperezma@redhat.com" References: <20221130155639.150553-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 1/30/23 06:57, Xia, Chenbo wrote: > Hi Maxime, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Maxime Coquelin >> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 11:56 PM >> To: dev@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo ; >> david.marchand@redhat.com; eperezma@redhat.com >> Cc: Maxime Coquelin >> Subject: [PATCH v1 00/21] Add control queue & MQ support to Virtio-user >> vDPA >> >> -- >> 2.38.1 > > I see there is one virtio test failed on patchwork, could you check if > it's related? The logs are missing, so hard to tell. But the same test_virtio_loopback test is passing with "XL710" setup, whereas the NIC should not be involved in it. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2022-November/327608.html Maxime > > Thanks, > Chenbo >