* [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous
@ 2021-10-14 2:13 Min Hu (Connor)
2021-10-19 11:52 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-10-14 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Declan Doherty
Hi, Declan Doherty,
In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
is propagated to all slaves.
While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is propagated
only to primary slave.
Why?
The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
of former primary should be set to the new primary?
Hope for your reply.
Best Wishes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous
2021-10-14 2:13 [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous Min Hu (Connor)
@ 2021-10-19 11:52 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-10-21 12:58 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-10-19 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Declan Doherty, Ferruh Yigit, Thomas Monjalon
Hi, anyone could give me a reply? thanks.
在 2021/10/14 10:13, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
> Hi, Declan Doherty,
> In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
> for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
> is propagated to all slaves.
>
> While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is propagated
> only to primary slave.
>
> Why?
>
> The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
> fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
> of former primary should be set to the new primary?
>
> Hope for your reply.
> Best Wishes.
> .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous
2021-10-19 11:52 ` Min Hu (Connor)
@ 2021-10-21 12:58 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-10-21 13:39 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-10-21 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Declan Doherty, Ferruh Yigit, Thomas Monjalon
Hi, Ferruh, Thomas,
any comments?
在 2021/10/19 19:52, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
> Hi, anyone could give me a reply? thanks.
>
> 在 2021/10/14 10:13, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
>> Hi, Declan Doherty,
>> In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
>> for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
>> is propagated to all slaves.
>>
>> While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is
>> propagated only to primary slave.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
>> fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
>> of former primary should be set to the new primary?
>>
>> Hope for your reply.
>> Best Wishes.
>> .
> .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous
2021-10-21 12:58 ` Min Hu (Connor)
@ 2021-10-21 13:39 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-10-21 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Declan Doherty, Ferruh Yigit, Thomas Monjalon, David Marchand
Hi, David,
how about your opinion ?
在 2021/10/21 20:58, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
> Hi, Ferruh, Thomas,
> any comments?
>
> 在 2021/10/19 19:52, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
>> Hi, anyone could give me a reply? thanks.
>>
>> 在 2021/10/14 10:13, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
>>> Hi, Declan Doherty,
>>> In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
>>> for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
>>> is propagated to all slaves.
>>>
>>> While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is
>>> propagated only to primary slave.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
>>> fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
>>> of former primary should be set to the new primary?
>>>
>>> Hope for your reply.
>>> Best Wishes.
>>> .
>> .
> .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous
@ 2021-10-27 3:21 Min Hu (Connor)
2021-10-27 13:47 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-10-27 3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand; +Cc: dev
Hi, David,
In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
is propagated to all slaves.
While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is propagated
only to primary slave.
Why?
The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
of former primary should be set to the new primary?
Hope for your reply.
Best Wishes.
.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous
2021-10-27 3:21 Min Hu (Connor)
@ 2021-10-27 13:47 ` David Marchand
2021-10-28 2:08 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2021-10-27 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Min Hu (Connor); +Cc: dev
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 5:21 AM Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, David,
> In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
> for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
> is propagated to all slaves.
>
> While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is propagated
> only to primary slave.
>
> Why?
From what I remember of the rework I did some time ago, the code was
already doing it and I did not question it.
I guess it mimicks what the Linux kernel bonding driver does.
>
> The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
> fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
> of former primary should be set to the new primary?
IOW, setting promisc on the link that becomes primary?
If it is not done, it sounds like a bug.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous
2021-10-27 13:47 ` David Marchand
@ 2021-10-28 2:08 ` Min Hu (Connor)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Min Hu (Connor) @ 2021-10-28 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand; +Cc: dev
在 2021/10/27 21:47, David Marchand 写道:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 5:21 AM Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, David,
>> In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
>> for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
>> is propagated to all slaves.
>>
>> While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is propagated
>> only to primary slave.
>>
>> Why?
>
>>From what I remember of the rework I did some time ago, the code was
> already doing it and I did not question it.
> I guess it mimicks what the Linux kernel bonding driver does.
>
>>
>> The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
>> fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
>> of former primary should be set to the new primary?
>
> IOW, setting promisc on the link that becomes primary?
> If it is not done, it sounds like a bug.
OK, I will try to fix it, thanks David.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-28 2:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-14 2:13 [dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous Min Hu (Connor)
2021-10-19 11:52 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-10-21 12:58 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-10-21 13:39 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-10-27 3:21 Min Hu (Connor)
2021-10-27 13:47 ` David Marchand
2021-10-28 2:08 ` Min Hu (Connor)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).