From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>, <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
<jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Rx offload API
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:21:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2995d82-9db4-59dd-3cb9-677e14022009@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1520923325-40400-2-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com>
On 03/13/2018 09:42 AM, Wei Dai wrote:
> Add following testpmd run-time commands to support test of
> new Rx offload API:
> rx_offload get capability <port_id>
> rx_offload get configuration <port_id>
> rx_offload enable|disable per_port <offload> <port_id>
> rx_offload enable|disable per_queue <offload> <port_id> <queue_id>
>
> Above last 2 commands should be run when the port is stopped.
> And <offload> can be one of "vlan_strip", "ipv4_cksum", ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 424 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 15 +-
> app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 438 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> index d1dc1de..dfd0ca6 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -15996,6 +15996,426 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_ptype_mapping_update = {
> },
> };
>
> +/* Get Rx offloads capability */
> +struct cmd_rx_offload_get_capa_result {
> + cmdline_fixed_string_t rx_offload;
> + cmdline_fixed_string_t get;
> + cmdline_fixed_string_t capability;
> + portid_t port_id;
> +};
> +
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_rx_offload_get_capa_rx_offload =
> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER
> + (struct cmd_rx_offload_get_capa_result,
> + rx_offload, "rx_offload");
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_rx_offload_get_capa_get =
> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER
> + (struct cmd_rx_offload_get_capa_result,
> + get, "get");
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_rx_offload_get_capa_capability =
> + TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER
> + (struct cmd_rx_offload_get_capa_result,
> + capability, "capability");
> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_rx_offload_get_capa_port_id =
> + TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER
> + (struct cmd_rx_offload_get_capa_result,
> + port_id, UINT16);
> +
> +static void
> +print_rx_offloads(uint64_t offloads)
> +{
> + uint64_t single_offload;
> +
> + for (single_offload = DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP;
> + single_offload <= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY;
It requires attention when a new offload is added.
Please, consider to use something like __builtin_ffsll(), print name of
the found bit, clear it and retry. It allows to avoid boundaries
specification.
<snip>
> +static int
> +config_rx_offload(const char *name, uint64_t *offload, int on)
> +{
> + uint64_t local = *offload;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(name, "vlan_strip")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "ipv4_cksum")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "udp_cksum")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "tcp_cksum")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "tcp_lro")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "qinq_strip")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_QINQ_STRIP;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_QINQ_STRIP;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "outer_ipv4_cksum")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "macsec_strip")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_MACSEC_STRIP;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_MACSEC_STRIP;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "header_split")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "vlan_filter")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "vlan_extend")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "jumbo_frame")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "crc_strip")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "scatter")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "timestamp")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP;
> + } else if (!strcmp(name, "security")) {
> + if (on)
> + local |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY;
> + else
> + local &= ~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY;
> + } else
> + return -1;
I was going to suggest rte_eth_dev_rx_offload_name(), strcasecmp() and loop.
It is possible to iterate on all U64 bits or add a way to get all
offload bits from rte_ethdev.
However it still requires list of offloads in the help below. So, it is
not easy to get rig of
offloads list completely. Just an idea. Up to you.
<snip>
> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_config_per_port_rx_offload = {
> + .f = cmd_config_per_port_rx_offload_parsed,
> + .data = NULL,
> + .help_str = "rx_offload enable|disable per_port vlan_strip|ipv4_cksum|"
> + "udp_cksum|tcp_cksum|tcp_lro|qinq_strip|outer_ipv4_cksum|"
> + "macsec_strip|header_split|vlan_filter|vlan_extend|"
> + "jumbo_frame|crc_strip|scatter|timestamp|security "
> + "<port_id>",
>
<snip>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-13 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 8:15 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] app/testpmd: add new commands to test new Tx/Rx " Wei Dai
2018-03-12 8:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Rx " Wei Dai
2018-03-12 8:42 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-03-13 1:06 ` Dai, Wei
2018-03-12 8:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Tx " Wei Dai
2018-03-13 6:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] app/testpmd: add new commands to test new Tx/Rx " Wei Dai
2018-03-13 6:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Rx " Wei Dai
2018-03-13 7:21 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2018-03-13 9:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-03-17 13:45 ` Dai, Wei
2018-03-14 19:40 ` Wu, Jingjing
2018-03-17 13:49 ` Dai, Wei
2018-03-13 6:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Tx " Wei Dai
2018-03-17 13:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] app/testpmd: add new commands to test new Tx/Rx " Wei Dai
2018-03-17 13:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: add enum type for loop on Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-17 13:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Rx offload API Wei Dai
2018-03-17 13:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Tx " Wei Dai
2018-03-19 12:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] app/testpmd: add new commands to test new Tx/Rx offload Wei Dai
2018-03-19 12:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: add enum type for loop on Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-19 12:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Rx offload API Wei Dai
2018-03-19 12:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] pp/testpmd: add commands to test new Tx " Wei Dai
2018-03-19 12:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] app/testpmd: add new commands to test new Tx/Rx offload Wei Dai
2018-03-19 12:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: add enum type for loop on Rx/Tx offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-19 14:05 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-03-20 1:52 ` Dai, Wei
2018-03-19 12:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Rx offload API Wei Dai
2018-03-19 12:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Tx " Wei Dai
2018-03-20 3:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] app/testpmd: add new commands to test new Tx/Rx offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-20 3:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Rx offload API Wei Dai
2018-03-20 3:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Tx " Wei Dai
2018-03-22 8:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] app/testpmd: add new commands to test new Tx/Rx offloads Wei Dai
2018-03-22 8:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Rx offload API Wei Dai
2018-03-30 8:40 ` Wu, Jingjing
2018-03-22 8:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Tx " Wei Dai
2018-03-30 23:05 ` Wu, Jingjing
2018-04-03 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/2] app/testpmd: add new commands to test new Tx/Rx offloads Wei Dai
2018-04-03 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Rx offload API Wei Dai
2018-04-03 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] app/testpmd: add commands to test new Tx " Wei Dai
2018-04-12 17:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/2] app/testpmd: add new commands to test new Tx/Rx offloads Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-08 13:30 ` Dai, Wei
2018-05-08 15:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-09 12:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] app/testpmd: add commands to test new offload API Wei Dai
2018-05-11 0:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-11 0:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2995d82-9db4-59dd-3cb9-677e14022009@solarflare.com \
--to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=wei.dai@intel.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).