From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0851DA4 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 23:45:15 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2019 14:45:15 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,449,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="123269189" Received: from anandraw-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.121.163.141]) ([10.121.163.141]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2019 14:45:14 -0800 To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Kadam, Pallavi" , "Menon, Ranjit" , "Shaw, Jeffrey B" References: <20190306041634.12976-1-anand.rawat@intel.com> <3476983.9kOtKhjYRY@xps> From: Anand Rawat Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:45:13 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3476983.9kOtKhjYRY@xps> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] HelloWorld example for windows X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 22:45:16 -0000 On 3/6/2019 12:29 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > 06/03/2019 05:16, Anand Rawat: >> v2 Changes: >> Incorporated reviews from v1. >> Fixed license period for updated files. >> Renamed 'winapp' folder to 'windows'. >> Cleaned unneeded meson changes. >> Fixed code style warnings. >> Added maintainers information for windows branch > > About the method, two advices: > > - Please reply to the questions asked during the review > of the previous version before doing a new version. > It is with discussion that we can find the best solutions. > Apologies, my email client was not setup to respond as per the community guidelines. There will be more interaction for v2 > - Please use --in-reply-to for new revisions in order to have > all revisions in the same mail thread. > The best is to make all revisions as replies of the first cover letter. > > I will make sure to follow this from v3 onward. Since now that there two cover letters, which one would you like me to have --in-reply-to for v3 -- Anand Rawat