DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
	<aman.deep.singh@intel.com>, <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: remove invalid ports when other process detach
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:05:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6a7ece4-d839-ed93-3031-61a7cd695c7d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31263d7d-b880-ff29-70d9-2a8f75b0bb45@huawei.com>

Hi Ferruh,

  Could you please review this patch, I notice the patch is delegated to you.

Thanks

On 2022/3/2 16:36, fengchengwen wrote:
> On 2022/3/2 16:26, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 02/03/2022 03:33, Chengwen Feng:
>>> Start main and secondary process:
>>> ./dpdk-testpmd -a BDF0 -a BDF1 --proc-type=auto -- -i --rxq=8 --txq=8
>>> 	--num-procs=2 --proc-id=0
>>> ./dpdk-testpmd -a BDF0 -a BDF1 --proc-type=auto -- -i --rxq=8 --txq=8
>>> 	--num-procs=2 --proc-id=1
>>> Execute following command in main process:
>>> 	port stop 0
>>> 	port detach 0
>>> Execute following command in secondary process:
>>> 	set fwd mac
>>> 	start
>>> The secondary process will display:
>>> 	Invalid port_id=0
>>> 	telcore 19 called rx_pkt_burst for not ready port 0
>>> 	stpmd> 8: [/lib64/libc.so.6(+0xdf600) [0xffff9e1dc600]]
>>> 	7: [/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7c48) [0xffff9e28ac48]]
>>> 	6: [/usr/app/testpmd(eal_thread_loop+0x2c4) [0xb23574]]
>>> 	5: [/usr/app/testpmd() [0x9c21d8]]
>>> 	4: [/usr/app/testpmd() [0x9c2108]]
>>> 	3: [/usr/app/testpmd() [0x9b6cf0]]
>>> 	2: [/usr/app/testpmd() [0xad8620]]
>>> 	1: [/usr/app/testpmd(rte_dump_stack+0x20) [0xb1a130]]
>>>
>>> The root cause it that the secondary process has not removed invalid
>>> ports when it processes RTE_ETH_EVENT_DESTROY event.
>>
>> Why the ports are not removed?
> 
> Testpmd register function eth_event_callback to deal with DESTROY event,
> currently it only assign ports[port_id].port_status with RTE_PORT_CLOSED, it
> doesn't update other global variables like nb_ports.
> 
>>
>>> This patch adds a delay remove invalid ports invoke when process the
>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_DESTROY event.
>>
>> Why do we need this delay?
> 
> The remove_invalid_ports will scan rte_eth_devices[], when process the DESTROY
> event, the rte_eth_devices[x] still valid, so here we should a delay logic.
> 
>>
>> [...]
>>> +static void
>>> +remove_invalid_ports_callback(void *arg)
>>> +{
>>> +	RTE_SET_USED(arg);
>>> +	remove_invalid_ports();
>>> +}
>> [...]
>>>  	case RTE_ETH_EVENT_DESTROY:
>>>  		ports[port_id].port_status = RTE_PORT_CLOSED;
>>>  		printf("Port %u is closed\n", port_id);
>>> +		if (rte_eal_alarm_set(100000, remove_invalid_ports_callback,
>>> +				(void *)(intptr_t)port_id))
>>> +			fprintf(stderr,
>>> +				"Could not set up deferred device released\n");
>>>  		break;
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
> 
> 
> .
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-11  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-02  2:33 Chengwen Feng
2022-03-02  8:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-03-02  8:36   ` fengchengwen
2022-04-11  2:05     ` fengchengwen [this message]
2022-05-20 15:05     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-20 15:14       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-21 10:00       ` fengchengwen
2022-05-23  8:43         ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a6a7ece4-d839-ed93-3031-61a7cd695c7d@huawei.com \
    --to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).