From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B17D42990; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:40:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F3740A79; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:40:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f171.google.com (mail-pg1-f171.google.com [209.85.215.171]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390C540A4B for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:40:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f171.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-51fcf5d1e44so399336a12.3 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:40:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=daynix-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1681954819; x=1684546819; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hNq1eHI0JUEk/q7UygzfnEOKQm4QuxtNp72Qz3S34pU=; b=aaNnuK3COF9/p3KOEPep/2y0At+dLh5OfY0SEcDFC89i8M0bkX+GRqmCyTUHmvTa+r WGU6r4HMthWXmZYGwsAXwv4LK3mFhosiMAVebNy0sDHo/+Z7c3PeUIf7aN0gu/NP9VkG 1erJwvASNHgYIvSdDxi1NOX6ptWyj4kMuoxlnZi+MJ+Ax3hIAjcdv9pDejk6lruKhEz9 EGQGp+5NgFKyIsdcP+XYmL4ezHE9Tx7H7nibp99bTGnjoYobeMFwI2EAb1hMiPtBx4SO Wfk3dbsJtsu8Qo7o5f3XRmvUwmLL6EasHDvujFN1pSHxFbi3hlo5r/KxuzKqR2CcFSME VW2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681954819; x=1684546819; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hNq1eHI0JUEk/q7UygzfnEOKQm4QuxtNp72Qz3S34pU=; b=a8ESxKmzflLv60i37lZouEDEtp/NMGPtdgiYk88Rw4BaG0VAf9iERyN2pI6vFP4WDu pp2KNx3Kcye6HqrvVkklxIDKHJlMhtAJNiJrNCrF/EmkzBHjal8RvMDsIVXEPK+Kidew LkkIdGO/VF2kVp+D86pjc4EV0Rbtbo4eJF7zK929CUMkkYOrlAtY8tyS5PYH8N2OyEGA kS008yp9eF/e5qJtsts/mrlt90GbEv6CGYa9uLq/zjtX2zZIfLULBE4UIR8nWyoO8zq+ t9FrsEf/EwxsE/hsy7PvVgmfNYiinUT+9FlD+YmhwJOqgeimuaBIHygcknYrlzPh5Ht8 WaYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dUxq4RoXNauPXJGmNRWPqw8Rmgz6jdk18glGmaI/kmdIlBzVIj zFG5ILVw0WijtXwWrp7UPF9t1g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YY7JLeydzfJZNCdWBcUQlQjkGraf20zbTXCNano0MYfjH9HjPSlHJJLq05ZkYSJSLgWT3WJg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:1185:b0:f1:c63a:f7ea with SMTP id oj5-20020a056a21118500b000f1c63af7eamr659065pzb.37.1681954819184; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.213.103.179] ([157.82.194.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n41-20020a056a000d6900b005e0699464e3sm12475pfv.206.2023.04.19.18.40.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:40:16 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: Do not require processor information Content-Language: en-US To: Ruifeng Wang , Bruce Richardson , =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=c5=a1?= Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , nd References: <20230414124139.66443-1-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> <20230414124139.66443-2-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> From: Akihiko Odaki In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 2023/04/17 16:41, Ruifeng Wang wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Akihiko Odaki >> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 8:42 PM >> To: Ruifeng Wang ; Bruce Richardson >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Akihiko Odaki >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: Do not require processor information >> >> DPDK can be built even without exact processor information for x86 and ppc so allow to >> build for Arm even if we don't know the targeted processor is unknown. > > Hi Akihiko, > > The design idea was to require an explicit generic build. > Default/native build doesn't fall back to generic build when SoC info is not on the list. > So the user has less chance to generate a suboptimal binary by accident. Hi, It is true that the suboptimal binary can result, but the rationale here is that we tolerate that for x86 and ppc so it should not really matter for Arm too. On x86 and ppc you don't need to modify meson.build just to run dts on a development machine. Regards, Akihiko Odaki