From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Ian Stokes <ian.stokes@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] net/i40e: use the common Rx queue structure
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 17:52:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCTKVAL2nSNU4rRP@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9f86c4577c1b0ee9923fef1d0fa61ac812803d8.1747054471.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> Make the i40e driver use the new common Rx queue structure.
>
> Because the i40e driver supports both 16-byte and 32-byte descriptor
> formats (controlled by RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_16BYTE_RX_DESC define), the common
> queue structure has to take that into account, so the ring queue structure
> will have both, while the actual descriptor format is picked by i40e at
> compile time using the above macro. Direct usage of Rx queue structure is
> now meant to be replaced with a macro access that takes descriptor size
> into account.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h | 14 ++
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 4 +-
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 4 +-
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 16 +--
> .../i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c | 6 +-
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 126 +++++++++---------
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h | 74 +++-------
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_common_avx.h | 6 +-
> .../net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_altivec.c | 22 +--
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_avx2.c | 12 +-
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_avx512.c | 12 +-
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h | 4 +-
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c | 24 ++--
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 24 ++--
> 14 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
> index 524de39f9c..db49db57d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct ci_rx_queue {
> struct rte_mempool *mp; /**< mbuf pool to populate RX ring. */
> union { /* RX ring virtual address */
> volatile union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *ixgbe_rx_ring;
> + volatile union i40e_16byte_rx_desc *i40e_rx_16b_ring;
> + volatile union i40e_32byte_rx_desc *i40e_rx_32b_ring;
Rather than doing this, would it not be better to keep using the current
scheme of just having an #ifdef aliasing i40e_rx_desc to either the 16byte
or 32byte variants?
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 13:27 [PATCH v1 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:39 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:52 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Bruce Richardson
2025-05-14 16:32 ` Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCTKVAL2nSNU4rRP@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).