From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
"Ian Stokes" <ian.stokes@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] net/iavf: use the common Rx queue structure
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 11:59:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCXJIo34sEid9hC2@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85efadfaf90568018e15c47e810c56b693d4a4cb.1747054471.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 01:54:32PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> Make the iavf driver use the new common Rx queue structure.
>
> Because the iavf driver supports both 16-byte and 32-byte descriptor
> formats (controlled by RTE_LIBRTE_IAVF_16BYTE_RX_DESC define), the common
> queue structure has to take that into account, so the ring queue structure
> will have both, while the actual descriptor format is picked by iavf at
> compile time using the above macro. Direct usage of Rx queue structure is
> now meant to be replaced with a macro access that takes descriptor size
> into account.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2:
> - Fix compile issues for Arm
>
> drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h | 12 ++
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf.h | 4 +-
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c | 12 +-
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c | 192 +++++++++---------
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx.h | 76 ++-----
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx2.c | 24 +--
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx512.c | 22 +-
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_common.h | 27 ++-
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_neon.c | 30 +--
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 46 ++---
> drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c | 6 +-
> 11 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 244 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
> index 9a691971bc..2d9328ae89 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct ci_rx_queue {
> volatile union i40e_32byte_rx_desc *i40e_rx_32b_ring;
> volatile union ice_16b_rx_flex_desc *ice_rx_16b_ring;
> volatile union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *ice_rx_32b_ring;
> + volatile union iavf_16byte_rx_desc *iavf_rx_16b_ring;
> + volatile union iavf_32byte_rx_desc *iavf_rx_32b_ring;
> };
Aren't the descriptors used by iavf the same as those used by i40e, and the
flex descriptors used by it the same as those used by ice? If so, we should
look to merge their definitions.
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 13:27 [PATCH v1 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:39 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:52 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:09 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:55 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:59 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2025-05-15 11:11 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:57 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 11:07 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Bruce Richardson
2025-05-14 16:32 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:58 ` Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCXJIo34sEid9hC2@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).