DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
	"Ian Stokes" <ian.stokes@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] net/iavf: use the common Rx queue structure
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:57:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCXkuqkk0eNsV2Iq@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cfc5dfa-a693-4c69-b048-3da1d0169645@intel.com>

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 01:11:03PM +0200, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 5/15/2025 12:59 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 01:54:32PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> > > Make the iavf driver use the new common Rx queue structure.
> > > 
> > > Because the iavf driver supports both 16-byte and 32-byte descriptor
> > > formats (controlled by RTE_LIBRTE_IAVF_16BYTE_RX_DESC define), the common
> > > queue structure has to take that into account, so the ring queue structure
> > > will have both, while the actual descriptor format is picked by iavf at
> > > compile time using the above macro. Direct usage of Rx queue structure is
> > > now meant to be replaced with a macro access that takes descriptor size
> > > into account.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Notes:
> > >      v2:
> > >      - Fix compile issues for Arm
> > > 
> > >   drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h                 |  12 ++
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf.h                 |   4 +-
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c          |  12 +-
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c            | 192 +++++++++---------
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx.h            |  76 ++-----
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx2.c   |  24 +--
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx512.c |  22 +-
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_common.h |  27 ++-
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_neon.c   |  30 +--
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c    |  46 ++---
> > >   drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c           |   6 +-
> > >   11 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 244 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
> > > index 9a691971bc..2d9328ae89 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
> > > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct ci_rx_queue {
> > >   		volatile union i40e_32byte_rx_desc *i40e_rx_32b_ring;
> > >   		volatile union ice_16b_rx_flex_desc *ice_rx_16b_ring;
> > >   		volatile union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *ice_rx_32b_ring;
> > > +		volatile union iavf_16byte_rx_desc *iavf_rx_16b_ring;
> > > +		volatile union iavf_32byte_rx_desc *iavf_rx_32b_ring;
> > >   	};
> > 
> > Aren't the descriptors used by iavf the same as those used by i40e, and the
> > flex descriptors used by it the same as those used by ice? If so, we should
> > look to merge their definitions.
> > 
> 
> They're coming from base code. We can do that, but I'm not sure how that
> would play with the rest of the driver and compatibility between ethdev
> parts and calling into base code.
> 
Hmmm, for the base code, we could just add a typedef for iavf_rx_desc to
i40e_rx_desc in the osdep.h header.

/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-15 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06 13:27 [PATCH v1 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:39     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:45     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:52     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:09       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:55         ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:56     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:59     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:11       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:57         ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:56     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:58     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 11:07     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:58   ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Bruce Richardson
2025-05-14 16:32   ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:15     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:58       ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aCXkuqkk0eNsV2Iq@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).