From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>,
Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Maayan Kashani <mkashani@nvidia.com>, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add size parameter to raw_encap action
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 13:55:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aab5acf2-acfb-4990-970f-3d02c236c0fb@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IA1PR12MB83113CD8776E8D5EB1A5F4ABA44B2@IA1PR12MB8311.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On 2/9/2024 1:43 PM, Dariusz Sosnowski wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dariusz Sosnowski
>> Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 12:04
>> To: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>; Maayan Kashani
>> <mkashani@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Aman Singh
>> <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add size parameter to raw_encap action
>>
>> Hi Gregory,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 09:31
>>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>>> Cc: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>; Maayan Kashani
>>> <mkashani@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Aman Singh
>>> <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add size parameter to raw_encap action
>>>
>>> Testpmd always provides RAW_ENCAP flow action configuration with encap
>>> buffer and the buffer size.
>>> That implementation does not allow to create non-masked raw_encap
>>> action in the template API actions template.
>>>
>>> The patch adds the `size` parameter to testpmd `raw_encap` action
>>> configuration.
>>> Testpmd can create non-masked raw-encap action template and specify
>>> encap buffer during flow creation.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> # total data size is 50
>>> testpmd> set raw_encap 0 \
>>> eth src is 11:22:33:44:55:66 dst is aa:bb:cc:dd:01:aa / \
>>> ipv4 src is 31.31.31.31 dst is 63.63.63.1 / udp src is 1 / \
>>> vxlan vni is 1 / end_set
>>>
>>> testpmd> flow actions_template 0 create ingress \
>>> actions_template_id 50 \
>>> template raw_encap size 50 / jump / end \
>>> mask raw_encap size 50 / jump / end \
>>>
>>> tstpmd> flow queue 0 create 0 template_table 0 \
>>> pattern_template 0 actions_template 0 postpone no \
>>> pattern ... end \
>>> actions raw_encap index 0 / jump group 1 / end
>>>
>>> The new `size` parameter is mutually exclusive with the existing
>>> `index` parameter.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
>>
>> The following sequence of commands results in "Bad arguments" error, but I
>> think it should be accepted.
>>
>> testpmd> port stop all
>> Stopping ports...
>> Checking link statuses...
>> Done
>> testpmd> flow configure 0 queues_number 4 queues_size 64
>> Configure flows on port 0: number of queues 4 with 64 elements
>> testpmd> port start all
>> Port 0: B8:CE:F6:7B:D8:E0
>> Checking link statuses...
>> Done
>> testpmd> set raw_encap 0 eth src is 11:22:33:44:55:66 dst is
>> testpmd> aa:bb:cc:dd:01:aa / ipv4 src is 31.31.31.31 dst is 63.63.63.1 /
>> testpmd> udp src is 1 / vxlan vni is 1 / end_set flow actions_template 0
>> testpmd> create ingress actions_template_id 100 template raw_encap index
>> testpmd> 0 / jump / end mask raw_encap index 0 / jump / end
>> Bad arguments
>
> I bisected the tree, and it appears that this issue is not caused by this commit, but it's an existing problem in testpmd.
> The root cause of "Bad arguments" is the fact that when parsing function for raw_encap index is called,
> parse_int() is called with size == 0, but raw_encap index size is sizeof(size_t).
> This causes a failure in validation introduced in commit 913b919906da ("app/testpmd: add size validation to token parsers").
>
> The same issue appears for other cases where parse_int() is called with size == 0 e.g., parsing RSS queues in RSS flow action.
> I'll provide a patch for testpmd which addresses that.
>
Hi Dariusz,
I merged that patch recently, and it is still not merged to main repo,
so we can drop it from next-net if required, instead of having a fix on
top of it.
That patch is because of a defect that overwrites some memory, and side
impact you mentioned was not expected.
Can you please sync with Gregory about it first?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 7:30 Gregory Etelson
2024-02-08 22:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-09 11:03 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-09 13:43 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-09 13:55 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2024-02-09 14:01 ` Gregory Etelson
2024-02-09 15:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-09 16:00 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-09 16:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aab5acf2-acfb-4990-970f-3d02c236c0fb@amd.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
--cc=getelson@nvidia.com \
--cc=mkashani@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).