From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62175A0A02; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:30:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE0D140EB0; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:30:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FAE140E9B; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:30:40 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: 2ppzODvngxhaJ6Q+D+IDOF1Alb/wFaG3hM0eZjX9GRwBgEQurlwS9Pg3KBPcNcDD/WxaYTIPfS vK7L+tRwm1uQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9863"; a="178332019" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,344,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="178332019" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jan 2021 09:30:39 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 9o5c+EizcZlxsQZ1z9znRmD+lFPV0GR7XREHT/RGIuIwLMU98MuDHFNQIullEnsva+zv4IpUuF SQUbLHObbgBw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,344,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="381937540" Received: from aburakov-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.253.108]) ([10.213.253.108]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jan 2021 09:30:38 -0800 To: David Hunt , dev@dpdk.org Cc: stable@dpdk.org References: <20201217113656.28884-1-david.hunt@intel.com> <20210108143048.23755-1-david.hunt@intel.com> <2a4c607c-8919-7572-0646-c9627e6cbe48@intel.com> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:30:37 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] power: fix make build for power apps X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 13-Jan-21 1:25 PM, David Hunt wrote: > > On 13/1/2021 11:18 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: >> On 13-Jan-21 11:14 AM, David Hunt wrote: >>> Hi Anatoly, >>> >>> On 13/1/2021 11:08 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: >>>> On 08-Jan-21 2:30 PM, David Hunt wrote: >>>>> The power example applications that uses the virtio-serial method of >>>>> communication cannot currently be built with make, and can only be >>>>> built >>>>> using meson/ninja. >>>>> >>>>> The guest channel message definitions and functions in guest_channel.h >>>>> are needed by applications and need to be made public. >>>>> >>>>> This worked pre-20.11, but now with all the meson/ninja changes, >>>>> making >>>>> these apps externally no longer works. To fix, we need to move the >>>>> header >>>>> file with the API definitions for the channel commands public, and >>>>> rename >>>>> the functions accordingly. >>>>> >>>>> The main change is to rename channel_commands.h to >>>>> rte_power_guest_channel.h so that it gets picked up by the >>>>> installer and >>>>> copied to /usr/local/include. Other changes include renaming >>>>> #defines to >>>>> have RTE_ at the beginning instead of CPU_. Finally we refactor the >>>>> code >>>>> to work with those changes. >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> v2 changes >>>>>    - re-worked from monolithic patch to a 6 patch patchset for >>>>> easier review >>>>> >>>>> [PATCH v2 1/6] power: create guest channel public header file >>>>> [PATCH v2 2/6] power: make channel msg functions public >>>>> [PATCH v2 3/6] power: rename public structs >>>>> [PATCH v2 4/6] power: rename defines >>>>> [PATCH v2 5/6] power: add new header file to export list >>>>> [PATCH v2 6/6] power: clean up includes >>>>> >>>> >>>> Just a general question: wouldn't it be better to move this stuff >>>> entirely into sample app and not bother with keeping it in the >>>> library? There is precedent - ethtool app has a "library" and an >>>> "application" part, i think you should be able to move it out of the >>>> library and into the sample app entirely without too much trouble, >>>> as code looks to be fairly self-contained. >>>> >>> >>> Agreed, that's a great idea. I could have a common lib under >>> examples/vm_power_manager, then two apps, vm_power_manager and >>> guest_cli. That would keep everything nicely local, and not expose >>> the channel API publicly. The only reason we were making it public >>> was to allow "make" to work, so that's not a good enought reason, >>> tbh. I'll throw a prototype together today. >> >> Yep, IIRC Make works perfectly fine with ethtool, so i don't see why >> it wouldn't work for your sample app as well. Thanks! > > > Hi Anatoly, > > OK, so I was investigating this, and have come across a blocker on this > method. > > There are three methods for managing frequency, acpi, pstate and vm. > It's the third method that's causing the problem with moving the channel > functionality out into a sample library alongside vm_power_manger. VM's > can call channel functions in the power library to affect frequency for > their cores, and these functions use api function calls and several > structures and #defines in their code, which is currently part of the > power management library. These function declarations, structs and > #defines ere needed in both the examples lib/apps and the power library > itself, and the prototype changes I made ended up looking very much like > the patch set that's already on the mailing list. > > So, while I would have liked to have a solution along the lines of what > you've proposed, it's not possible based on the dependencies on common > structues and #defines. > > Thanks for the suggestion, though. > > Rgds, > Dave. > OK, i guess we can live with that. I wonder if there's another way to do this, but since i can't think of anything that doesn't involve serious API/ABI breakages, this is OK IMO. -- Thanks, Anatoly