Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 04/16] dma/idxd: create dmadev instances on bus probe

[fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>]

On 2021/10/19 22:10, Kevin Laatz wrote:
> When a suitable device is found during the bus scan/probe, create a dmadev
> instance for each HW queue. Internal structures required for device
> creation are also added.
> 

[snip]

>  static void *
>  idxd_bus_mmap_wq(struct rte_dsa_device *dev)
>  {
> @@ -206,6 +218,7 @@ idxd_probe_dsa(struct rte_dsa_device *dev)
>  		return -1;
>  	idxd.max_batch_size = ret;
>  	idxd.qid = dev->addr.wq_id;
> +	idxd.u.bus.dsa_id = dev->addr.device_id;
>  	idxd.sva_support = 1;
>  
>  	idxd.portal = idxd_bus_mmap_wq(dev);
> @@ -214,6 +227,12 @@ idxd_probe_dsa(struct rte_dsa_device *dev)
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = idxd_dmadev_create(dev->wq_name, &dev->device, &idxd, &idxd_bus_ops);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		IDXD_PMD_ERR("Failed to create rawdev %s", dev->wq_name);

rawdev -> dmadev

> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/idxd/idxd_common.c b/drivers/dma/idxd/idxd_common.c
> index e00ddbe5ef..5abff34292 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/idxd/idxd_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/idxd_common.c
> @@ -2,10 +2,71 @@
>   * Copyright 2021 Intel Corporation
>   */
>  
> +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> +#include <rte_common.h>
>  #include <rte_log.h>
>  
>  #include "idxd_internal.h"
>  
> +#define IDXD_PMD_NAME_STR "dmadev_idxd"
> +
> +int
> +idxd_dmadev_create(const char *name, struct rte_device *dev,
> +		   const struct idxd_dmadev *base_idxd,
> +		   const struct rte_dma_dev_ops *ops)
> +{
> +	struct idxd_dmadev *idxd = NULL;
> +	struct rte_dma_dev *dmadev = NULL;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!name) {
> +		IDXD_PMD_ERR("Invalid name of the device!");
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Allocate device structure */
> +	dmadev = rte_dma_pmd_allocate(name, dev->numa_node, sizeof(struct idxd_dmadev));
> +	if (dmadev == NULL) {
> +		IDXD_PMD_ERR("Unable to allocate raw device");

raw -> dma

Better check the 'raw' keyword in the patch set.

> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	}
> +	dmadev->dev_ops = ops;
> +	dmadev->device = dev;
> +
> +	idxd = dmadev->data->dev_private;
> +	*idxd = *base_idxd; /* copy over the main fields already passed in */
> +	idxd->dmadev = dmadev;
> +
> +	/* allocate batch index ring and completion ring.
> +	 * The +1 is because we can never fully use
> +	 * the ring, otherwise read == write means both full and empty.
> +	 */
> +	idxd->batch_comp_ring = rte_zmalloc(NULL, (sizeof(idxd->batch_idx_ring[0]) +
> +			sizeof(idxd->batch_comp_ring[0]))	* (idxd->max_batches + 1),
> +			sizeof(idxd->batch_comp_ring[0]));

infer the batch_comp_ring will access by hardware, maybe better use rte_zmalloc_socket()
because rte_zmalloc will use rte_socket_id() and it may at diff socket when call.

> +	if (idxd->batch_comp_ring == NULL) {
> +		IDXD_PMD_ERR("Unable to reserve memory for batch data\n");
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> 

[snip]