From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Tetsuya Mukawa <mtetsuyah@gmail.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Vipin Varghese <Vipin.Varghese@amd.com>,
Thiyagarjan P <Thiyagarajan.P@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/null: Add fast mbuf release TX offload
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 10:15:07 +0400 (+04) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0cd9f5d-91d2-62e5-6a14-f567395c21b5@arknetworks.am> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250726044827.569456-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4018 bytes --]
Hi Morten,
Good patch. Please see below.
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025, Morten Brørup wrote:
> Added fast mbuf release, re-using the existing mbuf pool pointer
> in the queue structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Also announce the offload as a per-queue capability.
> * Added missing test of per-device offload configuration when configuring
> the queue.
> ---
> drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c b/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c
> index 8a9b74a03b..09cfc74494 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,17 @@ struct pmd_internals;
> struct null_queue {
> struct pmd_internals *internals;
>
> + /**
> + * For RX queue:
> + * Mempool to allocate mbufs from.
> + *
> + * For TX queue:
Perhaps spell it 'Rx', 'Tx', but this is up to you.
> + * Mempool to free mbufs to, if fast release of mbufs is enabled.
> + * UINTPTR_MAX if the mempool for fast release of mbufs has not yet been detected.
> + * NULL if fast release of mbufs is not enabled.
> + *
> + * @see RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE
> + */
May be it would be better to have a separate 'tx_pkt_burst' callback, to avoid
conditional checks below. Though, I understand this will downgrade the per-queue
capability to the per-port only, so feel free to disregard this point.
> struct rte_mempool *mb_pool;
> void *dummy_packet;
>
> @@ -151,7 +162,16 @@ eth_null_tx(void *q, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_bufs)
> for (i = 0; i < nb_bufs; i++)
> bytes += rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(bufs[i]);
>
> - rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(bufs, nb_bufs);
> + if (h->mb_pool != NULL) { /* RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE */
> + if (unlikely(h->mb_pool == (void *)UINTPTR_MAX)) {
> + if (unlikely(nb_bufs == 0))
> + return 0; /* Do not dereference uninitialized bufs[0]. */
> + h->mb_pool = bufs[0]->pool;
> + }
> + rte_mbuf_raw_free_bulk(h->mb_pool, bufs, nb_bufs);
> + } else {
> + rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(bufs, nb_bufs);
> + }
> rte_atomic_fetch_add_explicit(&h->tx_pkts, nb_bufs, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
> rte_atomic_fetch_add_explicit(&h->tx_bytes, bytes, rte_memory_order_relaxed);
>
> @@ -259,7 +279,7 @@ static int
> eth_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
> uint16_t nb_tx_desc __rte_unused,
> unsigned int socket_id __rte_unused,
> - const struct rte_eth_txconf *tx_conf __rte_unused)
> + const struct rte_eth_txconf *tx_conf)
> {
> struct rte_mbuf *dummy_packet;
> struct pmd_internals *internals;
> @@ -284,6 +304,10 @@ eth_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
>
> internals->tx_null_queues[tx_queue_id].internals = internals;
> internals->tx_null_queues[tx_queue_id].dummy_packet = dummy_packet;
> + internals->tx_null_queues[tx_queue_id].mb_pool =
> + (dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads | tx_conf->offloads) &
> + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE ?
> + (void *)UINTPTR_MAX : NULL;
Given the fact that FAST_FREE and MULTI_SEGS are effectively conflicting,
wouldn't it be better to have a check for the presence of both flags here? I'm
not sure whether this is already checked at the generic layer above the PMD.
Thank you.
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -309,7 +333,10 @@ eth_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> dev_info->max_rx_queues = RTE_DIM(internals->rx_null_queues);
> dev_info->max_tx_queues = RTE_DIM(internals->tx_null_queues);
> dev_info->min_rx_bufsize = 0;
> - dev_info->tx_offload_capa = RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS | RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE;
> + dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa = RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE;
> + dev_info->tx_offload_capa = RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS |
> + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE |
> + dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa;
>
> dev_info->reta_size = internals->reta_size;
> dev_info->flow_type_rss_offloads = internals->flow_type_rss_offloads;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-26 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-24 18:14 [PATCH] " Morten Brørup
2025-06-26 14:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-26 15:44 ` Morten Brørup
2025-06-27 12:07 ` Varghese, Vipin
2025-07-26 4:34 ` Morten Brørup
2025-07-26 4:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Morten Brørup
2025-07-26 6:15 ` Ivan Malov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0cd9f5d-91d2-62e5-6a14-f567395c21b5@arknetworks.am \
--to=ivan.malov@arknetworks.am \
--cc=Thiyagarajan.P@amd.com \
--cc=Vipin.Varghese@amd.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=mtetsuyah@gmail.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).