From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1554A0032; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26614067B; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F85740042 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:26:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1650612404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XWWjP5HQuc/MXKgZCIsHgl3UR4mx+hAhKIdTsjYMyOg=; b=BY81C1di3azb/nViSfUvDarzzsFZ0/1YiXQQB/hprvAqQlLViWpDe6+jNzcVaCYZptPprN XxLWhZpkF8eRffARH98VbxUtUWZi13EBv+LBMSPuxuxPRfFfd2zAYqkg9JsiaOp7oUFL09 QQxaN+NFAUNpcdppjCOwT0Fgl5mNvpg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-350-a7GTRnHcMlq5DxNPNgSJew-1; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 03:26:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: a7GTRnHcMlq5DxNPNgSJew-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE258117B0; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 07:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.35] (unknown [10.39.208.35]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F324087D9C; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 07:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:26:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 6/8] vhost: annotate vDPA device list accesses To: David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, chenbo.xia@intel.com, jiayu.hu@intel.com, yuanx.wang@intel.com, xuan.ding@intel.com References: <20220328121758.26632-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20220411110013.18624-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20220411110013.18624-7-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <20220411110013.18624-7-david.marchand@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.1 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 4/11/22 13:00, David Marchand wrote: > vdpa_device_list access must be protected with vdpa_device_list_lock > spinlock. > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > --- > lib/vhost/vdpa.c | 17 ++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin Thanks, Maxime