From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06ACEA04B1; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:23:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431AA1BEC5; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:23:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E72B62; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:23:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id t14so5099360wmi.3; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 06:23:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=2HqVlnW7dNg4I3giCexEGowBTfxnsKkIdourcNjg9YY=; b=O7SowhvN9OLxRjvTLXpifJa5NXJr2m57Xs3jG5zEaUEUX/BZBcNQc5/Rqd6XM6lzJ5 EJXPESAvgum8lwG6geYM04KvpDDi9hLt30MbYTtTM+q5KDNBvbJCnY4Axxq1HRyJmPqu 1d1K2W52ObYdi5Q4rsh2cqzzAQb3YHRaJf6+af9pk0VhuDc5snv/3PhGzjZGBmTIDyiO +g99qbNhXa5TaSNDWYJJ18ermbTlBvD0B9buPDdKtDCi/7f7DYI8mSO3qa8h+z8ELPAj 32d/litpDNRmMwU02yXYSYjOt27T5tUF+i4ghyhcnlZm/H8MmlpsA1JWP/h+aDwBm+QG Qtjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xL1JFNs1gkXVg47pHnlHuFTTwtqtGjvap9reH7hSMgWH31vwN YpwPnfh8woOqcf9jcsCrR80= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1C3Zelerhm7GPl1/Y/aQUxjSdKx1sCRyLM2qfoACWiqvLeA8MwH1n5AenK/4hpI1sI7MY2A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1d8a:: with SMTP id d132mr12551846wmd.55.1598534593841; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 06:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j7sm6372098wrw.35.2020.08.27.06.23.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 06:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Luca Boccassi To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "stable@dpdk.org" , "Chen, BoX C" Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:23:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7701fd6c-6e1b-6834-12ac-35b9fd612625@intel.com> References: <20200818181222.8462-1-bluca@debian.org> <5e4efca917b88a9f6983229369547a1f410a110b.camel@debian.org> <45bd96a0-b8d6-ea77-68ea-1a2d6f016051@intel.com> <7701fd6c-6e1b-6834-12ac-35b9fd612625@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.4 patches review and test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 11:57 +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > On 27-Aug-20 11:37 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 10:47 +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > > > On 26-Aug-20 10:50 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 02:30 +0000, Chen, BoX C wrote: > > > > > Hi Luca, > > > > > Update LTS 19.11.4 test result for Intel part. No new issue is fo= und except known issues. > > > >=20 > > > > Thank you! > > > >=20 > > > > > * Intel(R) Testing > > > > >=20 > > > > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > > > > > * PF(i40e):Passed > > > > > - Exception message when starting testpmd for testing exter= nal memory. It has been fixed on 20.05.patch link: http://patches.dpdk.org/= patch/66041/ > > > >=20 > > > > Anatoly, is it safe to backport this patch to 19.11? It applies and > > > > builds cleanly when cherry-picked: > > > >=20 > > > > d1c7c0cdf7ba ("vfio: map contiguous areas in one go") > > >=20 > > > Hi Luca, > > >=20 > > > Yes, it should be safe - at least i'm not aware of any breakages ever > > > being reported so far. Thanks! > >=20 > > Could you please double-check that there's no other patch/change that > > depends on it/that it depends on and is missing from 19.11.4-rc1? Given > > we wouldn't redo the full regression run, we need to be careful > >=20 >=20 > I'm positive that it's self-contained. It's just a different way of=20 > iterating through an array :) Thanks, applied and pushed. --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi