From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A83A0613 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 19:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C4E1DFF2; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 19:06:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F711DFEE for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 19:06:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7TGv6uh056717; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:06:12 -0400 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2upgfd68dc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:06:12 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7TH5NnH021518; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:06:10 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2ujvv75b83-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:06:10 +0000 Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.107]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7TH6AwQ55312848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:06:10 GMT Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AC4124054; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:06:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA0F124052; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:06:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davids-mbp.usor.ibm.com (unknown [9.70.84.102]) by b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:06:09 +0000 (GMT) To: Christian Ehrhardt , matan@mellanox.com, shahafs@mellanox.com Cc: dev , Luca Boccassi , Thomas Monjalon , Frank Heimes References: <20190813112843.27072-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> <20190813112843.27072-2-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> <5561160f-beff-c615-9c15-cf00954149ac@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: David Christensen Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:06:08 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-29_07:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=766 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908290180 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] net/mlx4: fix build on PPC64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" >>> error: incompatible types when initializing type >>> '__vector _bool int' {aka '_vector(4) __bool int'} using type 'int' >>> >>> If __APPLE_ALTIVEC__ is defined, then bool type is redefined >>> and conflicts with stdbool.h. >>> >>> There is no good solution to fix it for the whole project without >>> breaking something else, so a workaround is inserted in mlx5 PMD. >>> This workaround is not compatible with C++ but there is no C++ in DPDK. >>> >>> Related to: >>> https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=725f5dd0bfb50192a2d2341d4cc69084c2c4e03d >>> >>> Change-Id: Iceb058c07086def4176c5ab199ca4dd5018d0340 >>> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt >> >> Tested-by: David Christensen > > Thanks David, ping for considering inclusion into 19.11 ? Yes please. I had the same patch ready to submit but you beat me to the punch. Dave