From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <rsanford@akamai.com>,
<erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/timer: fix incorrect time interval
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 10:06:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b42c57f7-8260-65d1-e3ff-5e86d09d1503@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1986861.sBpPVbSSCl@thomas>
On 2021/5/6 5:37, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 15/04/2021 09:12, Min Hu (Connor):
>> From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
>>
>> Timer sample example assumes that the frequency of the timer is about
>> 2Ghz to control the period of calling rte_timer_manage(). But this
>> assumption is easy to fail. For example. the frequency of tsc on ARM64
>> is much less than 2Ghz.
>>
>> This patch uses the frequency of the current timer to calculate the
>> correct time interval to ensure consistent result on all platforms.
>>
>> In addition, the rte_rdtsc() is replaced with the more recommended
>> rte_get_timer_cycles function in this patch.
>>
>> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> [...]
>> /*
>> - * Call the timer handler on each core: as we don't
>> - * need a very precise timer, so only call
>> - * rte_timer_manage() every ~10ms (at 2Ghz). In a real
>> - * application, this will enhance performances as
>> - * reading the HPET timer is not efficient.
>> + * Call the timer handler on each core: as we don't need a
>> + * very precise timer, so only call rte_timer_manage()
>> + * every ~10ms. since rte_eal_hpet_init() has not been
>> + * called, the rte_rdtsc() will be used at runtime.
>
> I don't understand this last sentence.
>
This is explaining why we can use rte_get_timer_cycles() instead of rte_rdtsc().
In this example, we call tsc to improve its performance. So, we invoked rte_rdtsc()
here. Now the function rte_get_timer_cycles() encapsulates these counters. It will
invoke the corresponding counter according to the user's initialization of the counter.
>> + * In a real application, this will enhance performances
>> + * as reading the HPET timer is not efficient.
>> */
>> - cur_tsc = rte_rdtsc();
>> + cur_tsc = rte_get_timer_cycles();
>
>
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-06 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 7:12 Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 18:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-22 1:38 ` Chengchang Tang
2021-04-21 19:12 ` Carrillo, Erik G
2021-05-05 21:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-06 2:06 ` Chengchang Tang [this message]
2021-05-06 8:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-06 8:23 ` Chengchang Tang
2021-05-06 9:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-05-12 14:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b42c57f7-8260-65d1-e3ff-5e86d09d1503@huawei.com \
--to=tangchengchang@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=rsanford@akamai.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).