From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:01:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4654952-a60f-c9f6-6180-d78a770a0480@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211013110131.2909604-3-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
On 10/13/21 2:01 PM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> Mempool is a generic allocator that is not necessarily used for device
> IO operations and its memory for DMA. Add MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO flag to mark
> such mempools automatically if their objects are not contiguous
> or IOVA are not available. Components can inspect this flag
> in order to optimize their memory management.
> Discussion: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-August/216654.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
See review notes below. With review notes processed:
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
[snip]
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
> index f643a61f44..74e0e6f495 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
> @@ -226,6 +226,9 @@ API Changes
> the crypto/security operation. This field will be used to communicate
> events such as soft expiry with IPsec in lookaside mode.
>
> +* mempool: Added ``MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO`` flag to give a hint to DPDK components
> + that objects from this pool will not be used for device IO (e.g. DMA).
> +
>
> ABI Changes
> -----------
> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> index 51c0ba2931..2204f140b3 100644
> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,8 @@ rte_mempool_populate_iova(struct rte_mempool *mp, char *vaddr,
>
> STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&mp->mem_list, memhdr, next);
> mp->nb_mem_chunks++;
> + if (iova == RTE_BAD_IOVA)
> + mp->flags |= MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO;
As I understand rte_mempool_populate_iova() may be called
few times for one mempool. The flag must be set if all
invocations are done with RTE_BAD_IOVA. So, it should be
set by default and just removed when iova != RTE_BAD_IOVA
happens.
Yes, it is a corner case. May be it makes sense to
cover it by unit test as well.
>
> /* Report the mempool as ready only when fully populated. */
> if (mp->populated_size >= mp->size)
> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> index 663123042f..029b62a650 100644
> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> @@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ struct rte_mempool {
> #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET 0x0008 /**< Default get is "single-consumer".*/
> #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED 0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */
> #define MEMPOOL_F_NO_IOVA_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need IOVA contiguous objs. */
> +#define MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO 0x0040
> + /**< Internal: pool is not usable for device IO (DMA). */
Please, put the documentation before the define.
/** Internal: pool is not usable for device IO (DMA). */
#define MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO 0x0040
>
> /**
> * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.
> @@ -991,6 +993,9 @@ typedef void (rte_mempool_ctor_t)(struct rte_mempool *, void *);
> * "single-consumer". Otherwise, it is "multi-consumers".
> * - MEMPOOL_F_NO_IOVA_CONTIG: If set, allocated objects won't
> * necessarily be contiguous in IO memory.
> + * - MEMPOOL_F_NON_IO: If set, the mempool is considered to be
> + * never used for device IO, i.e. for DMA operations.
> + * It's a hint to other components and does not affect the mempool behavior.
I tend to say that it should not be here if the flag is
internal.
> * @return
> * The pointer to the new allocated mempool, on success. NULL on error
> * with rte_errno set appropriately. Possible rte_errno values include:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-18 9:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-18 9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 3:12 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-08-18 9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-18 9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-08-18 9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-09-29 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " dkozlyuk
2021-09-29 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks dkozlyuk
2021-10-05 16:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-29 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag dkozlyuk
2021-10-05 16:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-12 6:06 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-29 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities dkozlyuk
2021-09-29 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration dkozlyuk
2021-10-12 0:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 0:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 6:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12 9:37 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 9:46 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12 0:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 3:37 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-10-12 6:42 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12 12:40 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 12:53 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12 13:11 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 0:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-12 0:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 8:52 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-15 9:13 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-19 13:08 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 12:12 ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 13:07 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 13:40 ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-13 11:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 9:01 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2021-10-15 9:18 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 9:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-15 9:38 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 9:43 ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 9:58 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 12:11 ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 9:25 ` David Marchand
2021-10-15 10:42 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 11:41 ` David Marchand
2021-10-15 12:13 ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 13:19 ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-15 13:27 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 13:43 ` Olivier Matz
2021-10-19 13:08 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-13 11:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 16:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 16:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-20 9:29 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-15 16:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-15 16:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-20 9:30 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-10-15 16:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-16 20:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-29 3:30 ` Jiang, YuX
2021-10-18 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] mempool: add event callbacks Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] mempool: add non-IO flag Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] common/mlx5: add mempool registration facilities Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-18 22:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] net/mlx5: support mempool registration Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-19 14:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] net/mlx5: implicit " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4654952-a60f-c9f6-6180-d78a770a0480@oktetlabs.ru \
--to=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dkozlyuk@nvidia.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).