DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>
To: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "Parthasarathy, JananeeX M" <jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: enhance power manager unit tests
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 13:09:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4cd295f-0f6a-c3cb-d81c-a33be40d4808@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F2A2C9022@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com>


On 24/4/2018 12:23 PM, Pattan, Reshma wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richardson, Bruce
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 11:59 AM
>> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>> Cc: Parthasarathy, JananeeX M <jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com>;
>> dev@dpdk.org; Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pattan@intel.com>; Hunt, David
>> <david.hunt@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: enhance power manager unit
>> tests
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:04:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 11/04/2018 16:14, Reshma Pattan:
>>>> Unit Testcases are added for power_acpi_cpu_freq, power_kvm_vm_test
>>>> to improve coverage
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jananee Parthasarathy
>>>> <jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com>
>>>> Acked-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
>>> Applied, thanks
>>>
>> Sadly, this patch seems to break shared library builds. If you try doing "make
>> test-build" with shared libraries on it will fail, or if you do a meson build using
>> shared libraries you will get the same result.
>>
>> The root cause is that the function guest_channel_host_connect() is a private
>> function and so is not listed in the shared library map file, preventing the test
>> app from linking.
>>
> Any action from my side required? Let me know.

Reshma,
     Looking at this, I think this particular unit test needs to be 
removed. The way it is at the moment, it's "faking" the connect, then 
any commands that are sent to the dummy host are only really to test to 
see if the API breaks, which is going to be captured by compilation 
tests anyway. I don't see the value of this unit test unless you have 
the full host setup underneath is, in which case it's no longer a unit 
test.
Also, we don't want to make these functions public, as they are only of 
use to the library internally, and there is no use for them publicly 
(unless a guest wants to fake a connection to a non-existent host).

What do you think?
Dave.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-24 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-06 13:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Reshma Pattan
2018-04-10 14:19 ` Hunt, David
2018-04-11 14:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Reshma Pattan
2018-04-23 21:04   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-24 10:58     ` Bruce Richardson
2018-04-24 11:23       ` Pattan, Reshma
2018-04-24 12:09         ` Hunt, David [this message]
2018-04-24 12:51           ` Pattan, Reshma
2018-04-24 22:34             ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-24 22:35               ` Pattan, Reshma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b4cd295f-0f6a-c3cb-d81c-a33be40d4808@intel.com \
    --to=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).