Re: 21.11.2 patches review and test

[Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>]

On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 11:26 +0000, Jiang, YuX wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jiang, YuX
> > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 11:01 AM
> > To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; stable@dpdk.org
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
> > <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> > Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> > <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen
> > <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>;
> > Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
> > <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> > Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee
> > <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Pei
> > Zhang
> > <pezhang@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan
> > Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> > <thomas@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>; Chen,
> > Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>; yanghliu@redhat.com
> > Subject: RE: 21.11.2 patches review and test
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 8:34 PM
> > > To: stable@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
> > <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> > > Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> > > <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen
> > > <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> > > <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>;
> > > Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <
> > > jerinj@marvell.com>;
> > > Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee
> > > <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Pei
> > Zhang
> > > <pezhang@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan
> > > Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> > <thomas@monjalon.net>;
> > > Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan
> > > <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>; yanghliu@redhat.com
> > > Subject: Re: 21.11.2 patches review and test
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 10:58 +0100, luca.boccassi@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.2.
> > > > 
> > > > The planned date for the final release is August 29th.
> > > > 
> > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and
> > > > report
> > > > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final
> > > > release the fixes and reported validations will be added to the
> > > > release
> > notes.
> > > > 
> > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> > > > 
> > > >     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.2-rc1
> > > > 
> > > > These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
> > > >     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > Luca Boccassi
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Any update from any of the validation teams? Any indication on
> > > how the
> > > tests are going?
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Luca Boccassi
> > 
> > Everything is fine, find one vhost related issue which is
> > investigated by Intel
> > Dev.
> > I will send a v1 report later. Thanks.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Yu Jiang
> 
> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.2-rc1 test
> rate is 90%, no critical issue is found.
> Failure defects as below:  
>     Bug1: [dpdk v21.11.2-rc1] examples/performance-thread meson build
> error with gcc12.1 on fedora36
>     Bug2: DPDK 21.11.1 cryptodev_qat_raw_api_autotest failing
>         - Intel Dev send a patch to skip oop test for raw api, need
> be reviewed and merged.

Hi,

Do you have a reference to this patch? I did not see anything new sent
to stable in the past week or so

>     Bug3: [21.11LTS]Test with the new local patch, Vhost-user meet
> Segmentation fault issue when quit virtio-user before stopping
> sending packets
>         - Intel Dev is under investigating.
> 
> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> * Build&CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest
> GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as
> Ubuntu20.04&22.04, Fedora36, RHEL8.4, etc.
>   - All test done. Find one new defect as Bug1. 
> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. 
>   - Test rate is 90%. No new dpdk issue is found. 
> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-
> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN,
> etc.		
>   - Test rate is 90%. No new dpdk issue is found. 	
> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package
> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible
> Descriptor, etc.
>   - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. 
> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including
> PF/VF single core performance test, etc.
>   - All test done. No big performance drop.
> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic
> test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
>   - All test passed.
> * Power: test scenarios including bi-direction/Telemetry/Empty Poll
> Lib/Priority Base Frequency, etc. 
>   - All test passed.
> 		
> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as
> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf
> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 7.0u3, etc.
>     - All test done. Find one new issue, Intel Dev is under
> investigating.
>       - Bug Summary:[21.11LTS]Test with the new local patch, Vhost-
> user meet Segmentation fault issue when quiting virtio-user before
> stopping sending packets
> * Cryptodev: 
> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API
> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
>   - All test done. Only one defect as the above.
> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance
> /Cryptodev Latency, etc.
>   - All test done, no perf drop.
> 
> Best regards,
> Yu Jiang