From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4976A04C7; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:40:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3E91BE8E; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:40:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44462DE0 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:40:44 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: qXDsucRJEBEBFAmKYa7bn++0ytBK4PhdsPCZXC2fdNMeb6f/63emvo0njq+wi3AJ1R0GPjUsot yz9bTH725JzQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9744"; a="138727201" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,429,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="138727201" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Sep 2020 01:40:43 -0700 IronPort-SDR: MMuvTk02chn+u3exRfqRUVfktgc+f4MdI5vAzQ9dyepSLJ6YtQzGhKqlram/RY4ffge+kqGLWV t+TnUwV9z6ww== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,429,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="345739146" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2020 01:40:42 -0700 Received: from shsmsx606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:40:42 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:40:40 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:40:40 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Guo, Junfeng" , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Xing, Beilei" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4 0/2] add AVF RSS support for IPv6 prefix Thread-Index: AQHWizkJvK2H4iUTl0ahppn3l44x0qlpYTjg Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:40:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20200915062609.3786061-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> <20200915081759.4072947-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200915081759.4072947-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.108.32.68] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] add AVF RSS support for IPv6 prefix X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Guo, Junfeng > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 4:18 PM > To: Zhang, Qi Z ; Wu, Jingjing ; > Xing, Beilei > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Guo, Junfeng > Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] add AVF RSS support for IPv6 prefix >=20 > RSS for IPv6 prefix fields are supported in this patchset, so that we can= use > prefixes instead of full IPv6 address for AVF RSS. The prefix here includ= es the > first 64 bits of both SRC and DST IPv6 address. >=20 > v4: > * correct proto hdrs refine logic. >=20 > v3: > * code rebase. >=20 > v2: > * add support RSS for GTPU IPv6 prefix 64bit. >=20 > [PATCH v4 1/2] net/iavf: replace function name with macro. > [PATCH v4 2/2] net/iavf: support RSS for IPv6 prefix 64bit. >=20 > Junfeng Guo (2): > net/iavf: replace function name with macro > net/iavf: support RSS for IPv6 prefix 64bit >=20 > drivers/net/iavf/iavf_hash.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >=20 > -- > 2.25.1 Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi