From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F208E1B53 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:21:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Aug 2017 04:21:33 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,441,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="123222602" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.57]) ([10.237.220.57]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Aug 2017 04:21:33 -0700 To: Beilei Xing , jingjing.wu@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org References: <1503477876-79084-1-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:21:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1503477876-79084-1-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] remove unused code of DPDK version X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:21:35 -0000 On 8/23/2017 9:44 AM, Beilei Xing wrote: > Since there's no specific version number to distinguish > DPDK pf and Linux kernel pf, DPDK vf won't recognize if > host is DPDK pf or kernel pf. The specific virtual channel > commands for DPDK pf and code of DPDK version can be deleted. Is DPDK i40e PF becomes functionally same with Linux i40e PF after this patchset? > > Beilei Xing (3): > net/i40e: remove virtual channel command for VLAN pvid > net/i40e: remove virtual channel command for VSI queue > net/i40e: remove DPDK PF version specific code > <...>