From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>,
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] net/tap: return empty port offload capabilities
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:57:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7dd34c4-dccb-471a-d8e9-b058b21c27b2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <868c93a7-70c3-72f7-3808-3f89d58ff5aa@intel.com>
On 4/26/2018 5:56 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/26/2018 12:13 PM, Ophir Munk wrote:
>> Fix internal report on port specific offload capabilities to be 0 (no
>> capabilities). Before this commit port capabilities were a clone of queue
>> capabilities, however the current TAP offload capabilities (e.g.
>> checksum calculation) are per queue and are not specific per port.
>> This commit fixes an internal validation check for new configured
>> queue offloads.
>> The port capability API keeps reporting all queue capabilities as port
>> capabilities.
>>
>> Fixes: 95ae196ae10b ("net/tap: use new Rx offloads API")
>> Fixes: 818fe14a9891 ("net/tap: use new Tx offloads API")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 16:15 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] " Ophir Munk
2018-04-25 16:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 11:09 ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-25 16:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-25 17:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 11:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ophir Munk
2018-04-26 16:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-26 16:57 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7dd34c4-dccb-471a-d8e9-b058b21c27b2@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olgas@mellanox.com \
--cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
--cc=pascal.mazon@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).