From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Li Feng <fengli@smartx.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: lifeng1519@gmail.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_eal: add APIs to speedup virt2iova/phys
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:16:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc7ce6c4-e545-2f2b-a1cb-34a56d66b4b7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200420110953.959884-1-fengli@smartx.com>
On 20-Apr-20 12:09 PM, Li Feng wrote:
> Using pread to replace lseek + read.
> And add new APIs to reduce open/close/lseek system call frequency when the
> user needs to convert a large range of virtual address space.
> - rte_mem_virt2iova_with_fd
> - rte_mem_virt2phy_with_fd
>
> Currently it will be used by spdk in spdk_mem_register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Feng <fengli@smartx.com>
> ---
These API's are IMO already on the verge of what's acceptable because of
the differences between PA, DPDK IOVA and external memory IOVA. I'm not
sure building on top of them is a good idea. It's also quite platform
specific - rte_mem_virt2phy could potentially work with Windows (and in
fact there was an RFC for it), but would this API work with Windows,
given that Windows doesn't have fd's? Should we perhaps replace fd's
with an opaque structure pointer, so that each platform-specific
implementation could dereference it the way it needs to, without
exposing internal details of the platform?
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-20 11:09 Li Feng
2020-04-20 12:16 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2020-04-20 13:07 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-04-20 14:13 ` Li Feng
2021-03-25 13:32 ` David Marchand
2021-03-29 6:26 ` Li Feng
2021-04-01 10:38 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-04-06 10:40 ` Feng Li
2021-04-06 11:23 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc7ce6c4-e545-2f2b-a1cb-34a56d66b4b7@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengli@smartx.com \
--cc=lifeng1519@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).