DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Juraj Linkeš" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
To: Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Alex Chapman <alex.chapman@arm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
	Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Paul Szczepanek <paul.szczepanek@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: add L4 port to verbose output
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:32:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bdfec858-7296-48fa-9eff-c745becc435d@pantheon.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64c84d76-f40e-4a1e-aee0-f06d29004d4d@arm.com>



On 16. 8. 2024 13:46, Luca Vizzarro wrote:
> On 15/08/2024 16:22, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> The verbose output is already too verbose.
>> Maybe you would like the simpler format (which does include the port 
>> number)
>> see the network packet dissector patches.
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Thank you for the reply you left to Alex's patch. This is actually quite 
> helpful.
> 
> I've had a look at your patch series and the hexdump is actually quite 
> great for our purpose at DTS, as it will allow us to detect a preset 
> packet identifier in the payload.
> 
> Unfortunately, your patch doesn't solve the problem that Alex is having. 
> He's currently writing up a test suite to test the RSS hash keys and the 
> respective queues to which the incoming packets are placed into. To 
> correctly match the packets to the queue and hash key, he needs a way to 
> identify them. We explored some solutions and the L4 port seemed to be 
> the most problem-free with the least effort. Using the payload is 
> probably best and you've already posted the required changes too. The 
> only problem is that your hexdump output does not print the required RSS 
> values.
> 
> Would you be be keen to add these to your patch? Otherwise, do you have 
> any ideas and/or solutions to tackle this specific problem?
> 

Hi Stephen,

Do you have any advice for us?

Thanks,
Juraj

> Thank you,
> Luca Vizzarro


      reply	other threads:[~2024-09-09  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 14:20 Alex Chapman
2024-08-15 15:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-16 11:46   ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-09  8:32     ` Juraj Linkeš [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bdfec858-7296-48fa-9eff-c745becc435d@pantheon.tech \
    --to=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
    --cc=Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com \
    --cc=alex.chapman@arm.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=paul.szczepanek@arm.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).