DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Jake Freeland <jfree@FreeBSD.org>,
	Chenbo Xia <chenbox@nvidia.com>,
	"Nipun Gupta" <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
	Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] bus/pci/bsd: Fix device existence check
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 13:27:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <be4ff15c-46d5-4cc8-92d7-cdbf4940b90d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506174046.1136711-5-jfree@FreeBSD.org>

On 5/6/2025 7:40 PM, Jake Freeland wrote:
> Use open(2) instead of access(2) to check for the existence of the target
> device. This avoids a possible race condition where the the device file is
> removed after a successful call to access(2) but before open(2).
> 
> This also fixes any potential bugs associated with passing open(2)-style
> flags into access(2). i.e. access(2) does not formally support the O_RDWR
> flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jake Freeland <jfree@FreeBSD.org>
> ---

It's odd that static analysis didn't flag this, as that's the kind of 
thing it would normally complain about.

Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly

      reply	other threads:[~2025-05-08 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06 17:40 [PATCH 0/4] BSD PCI Fixes Jake Freeland
2025-05-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] bus/pci: Use force-noreplace flag when mapping PCI resources Jake Freeland
2025-05-08 11:32   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] bus/pci/bsd: Map resources at EAL baseaddr Jake Freeland
2025-05-08 11:31   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] bus/pci/bsd: Eliminate potential overflow Jake Freeland
2025-05-08 11:28   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] bus/pci/bsd: Fix device existence check Jake Freeland
2025-05-08 11:27   ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=be4ff15c-46d5-4cc8-92d7-cdbf4940b90d@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=chenbox@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jfree@FreeBSD.org \
    --cc=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).