* [Bug 1211] ice: 'eth / ipv4 / udp dst is XXX / mark' rte_flow not marking any packet
@ 2023-04-05 14:33 bugzilla
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2023-04-05 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5276 bytes --]
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1211
Bug ID: 1211
Summary: ice: 'eth / ipv4 / udp dst is XXX / mark' rte_flow not
marking any packet
Product: DPDK
Version: 23.03
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: ethdev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: maxime.leroy@6wind.com
Target Milestone: ---
Environment
-------------
distribution for host/vm: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS, kernel 5.15.0-67-generic
kernel driver: 1.10.1.2.2
firmware-version: 4.20 0x8001778a 1.3346.0
COMMS DDP: 1.3.37
ICE OS Default Package version 1.3.30.0
testpmd cmdline: ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd --log-level=.*ice.*,debug
--legacy-mem -c 0x1110001110 -a 0000:17:00.0 -a 0000:17:00.1 -- -i
--nb-cores=5 --nb-ports=2 --total-num-mbufs=16384 --rxq=4 --txq=4
dpdk version: 22.11.1
NIC: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller E810-C for QSFP
Reproduction
------------
Configuration
.............
On dut device, test-pmd configuration:
testpmd> set fwd rxonly
Set rxonly packet forwarding mode
testpmd> set verbose 1
Change verbose level from 0 to
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp dst is 42 / end
actions mark id 4 / end
ice_fdir_cur_prof_conflict(): Profile already exists for flow type 1.
ice_fdir_rx_parsing_enable(): FDIR processing on RX set to 1
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (1) flow
Flow rule #1 created
testpmd> start
Tester script:
# cat port-42.scapy
port = 42
p = []
p += Ether(src='b8:ce:f6:83:b3:13',
dst='40:a6:b7:7d:43:90')/IP(dst='10.100.0.2', src='10.100.0.1')/UDP(dport=port,
sport=port)
sendp(p, iface="eth1", count=3, inter=0.1)
With dpdk 23.03
...............
Tester Machine:
scapy < port-42.scapy
...>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
Sent 3 packets.
Result:
testpmd> port 0/queue 1: received 1 packets
src=B8:CE:F6:83:B3:13 - dst=40:A6:B7:7D:43:90 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - RSS hash=0xa1658a75 - RSS queue=0x1 - hw ptype:
L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP -
l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 - Receive queue=0x1
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
port 0/queue 1: received 1 packets
src=B8:CE:F6:83:B3:13 - dst=40:A6:B7:7D:43:90 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - RSS hash=0xa1658a75 - RSS queue=0x1 - hw ptype:
L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP -
l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 - Receive queue=0x1
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
port 0/queue 1: received 1 packets
src=B8:CE:F6:83:B3:13 - dst=40:A6:B7:7D:43:90 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - RSS hash=0xa1658a75 - RSS queue=0x1 - hw ptype:
L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP -
l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 - Receive queue=0x1
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
No Mark on packet !
With dpdk 22.11
...............
Tester Machine:
scapy < port-42.scapy
...>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
Sent 3 packets.
Result:
testpmd> port 0/queue 2: received 1 packets
src=B8:CE:F6:83:B3:13 - dst=40:A6:B7:7D:43:90 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - RSS hash=0xd302816a - RSS queue=0x2 - FDIR matched
ID=0x4 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw ptype: L2_ETHER
L3_IPV4 L4_UDP - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 - Receive queue=0x2
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH RTE_MBUF_F_RX_FDIR
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_FDIR_ID
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
port 0/queue 2: received 1 packets
src=B8:CE:F6:83:B3:13 - dst=40:A6:B7:7D:43:90 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - RSS hash=0xd302816a - RSS queue=0x2 - FDIR matched
ID=0x4 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw ptype: L2_ETHER
L3_IPV4 L4_UDP - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 - Receive queue=0x2
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH RTE_MBUF_F_RX_FDIR
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_FDIR_ID
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
port 0/queue 2: received 1 packets
src=B8:CE:F6:83:B3:13 - dst=40:A6:B7:7D:43:90 - pool=mb_pool_0 - type=0x0800
- length=60 - nb_segs=1 - RSS hash=0xd302816a - RSS queue=0x2 - FDIR matched
ID=0x4 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP - sw ptype: L2_ETHER
L3_IPV4 L4_UDP - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 - Receive queue=0x2
ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH RTE_MBUF_F_RX_FDIR
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_FDIR_ID
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
Packet is correctly marked.
It seems there is a regression between dpdk-22.11 and dpdk-23.03. Or at least,
a change of behavior of the rte flow API on ice pmd.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7280 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-04-05 14:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-05 14:33 [Bug 1211] ice: 'eth / ipv4 / udp dst is XXX / mark' rte_flow not marking any packet bugzilla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).