From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDA64259D; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 04:22:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D48402D7; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 04:22:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (inbox.dpdk.org [95.142.172.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBAC40041 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 04:22:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 92CBA4259F; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 04:22:47 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@dpdk.org To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [Bug 1288] af_packet do not support multi-process Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 02:22:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK X-Bugzilla-Component: ethdev X-Bugzilla-Version: 21.11 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: 779198444@qq.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=16947445670.2f3bc.155528 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --16947445670.2f3bc.155528 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 04:22:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1288 Bug ID: 1288 Summary: af_packet do not support multi-process Product: DPDK Version: 21.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: ethdev Assignee: dev@dpdk.org Reporter: 779198444@qq.com Target Milestone: --- hi,I'm recently have problem in using af_packet,I wanna do init in primary program and do rx_pkt_burst in secondary,so that I can make primary more stable,however, when change eth1 to af_packet, it cause coredump,and when I= gdb ,it shows rx_pkt_burst is not init in secondary. does the af_packet only support primary do rx_pkt_burst? is there any way if I want to do rx_pkt_burst in a secondary program? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --16947445670.2f3bc.155528 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 04:22:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All

Bug ID	1288
Summary	af_packet do not support multi-process
Product	DPDK
Version	21.11
Hardware	All
OS	All
Status	UNCONFIRMED
Severity	normal
Priority	Normal
Component	ethdev
Assignee	dev@dpdk.org
Reporter	779198444@qq.com
Target Milestone	---

hi,I'm recently have problem in us=
ing af_packet,I wanna do init in primary
program and do rx_pkt_burst in secondary,so that I can make primary more
stable,however, when change eth1 to af_packet, it cause coredump,and when I=
 gdb
,it shows rx_pkt_burst is not init in secondary.
does the af_packet only support primary do rx_pkt_burst?
is there any way if I want to do rx_pkt_burst in a secondary program?

You are receiving this mail because:

You are the assignee for the bug.

=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20

= --16947445670.2f3bc.155528--