From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69DF43A0F; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:42:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44451402CD; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:42:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (inbox.dpdk.org [95.142.172.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A8C402A8 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:42:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id E663443A10; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:42:06 +0100 (CET) From: bugzilla@dpdk.org To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [DPDK Bug 1376] A BPF can no longer include header rte_mbuf_core.h Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 15:42:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 23.11 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: michel@digirati.com.br X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=17066293260.0c3A.4062225 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --17066293260.0c3A.4062225 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:42:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1376 Bug ID: 1376 Summary: A BPF can no longer include header rte_mbuf_core.h Product: DPDK Version: 23.11 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: Normal Component: other Assignee: dev@dpdk.org Reporter: michel@digirati.com.br Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 272 --> https://bugs.dpdk.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D272&action=3Dedit Compilation errors for t2.c and t3.c A BPF needs to include the header to access struct rte_mb= uf. But the current version of the header cannot be included = in a BPF. The attached file shows the errors one gets while compiling the files examples/bpf/t2.c and examples/bpf/t3.c. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --17066293260.0c3A.4062225 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:42:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All

Bug ID	1376
Summary	A BPF can no longer include header rte_mbuf_core.h
Product	DPDK
Version	23.11
Hardware	x86
OS	Linux
Status	UNCONFIRMED
Severity	major
Priority	Normal
Component	other
Assignee	dev@dpdk.org
Reporter	michel@digirati.com.br
Target Milestone	---

Created attachment 272 [details]=

Compilation errors for t2.c and t3.c

A BPF needs to include the header <rte_mbuf_core.h> to access struct =
rte_mbuf.
But the current version of the header <rte_mbuf_core.h> cannot be inc=
luded in a
BPF. The attached file shows the errors one gets while compiling the files
examples/bpf/t2.c and examples/bpf/t3.c.

You are receiving this mail because:

You are the assignee for the bug.

=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20

= --17066293260.0c3A.4062225-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E327C43A11; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 20:07:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E5A402CD; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 20:07:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208D9402A8; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 20:07:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086) id 669EE20B2000; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:07:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 669EE20B2000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1706641662; bh=hrk1uoiO6aheXG9WshVvGX3eBtLgicNRNNp0UgO0FPA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FT3p6I31T+z4umqt5nqf4/csSBZ0CG8guY/AzNtMpUyDyoUjAV6PpkBkOiIa/cmi4 QragHCp+VuImip+8pGwsF46uVR1RM20Sg2+xjL9amXYWjnBPfLbl54Pni7KDJyOH2h iLH0Uo0KW7AjNV255gVvfxGGprpk+AjIRd9fRuf4= Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:07:42 -0800 From: Tyler Retzlaff To: bugzilla@dpdk.org Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [DPDK Bug 1376] A BPF can no longer include header rte_mbuf_core.h Message-ID: <20240130190742.GA18445@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:42:05PM +0000, bugzilla@dpdk.org wrote: > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1376 > > Bug ID: 1376 > Summary: A BPF can no longer include header rte_mbuf_core.h > Product: DPDK > Version: 23.11 > Hardware: x86 > OS: Linux > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Severity: major > Priority: Normal > Component: other > Assignee: dev@dpdk.org > Reporter: michel@digirati.com.br > Target Milestone: --- > > Created attachment 272 > --> https://bugs.dpdk.org/attachment.cgi?id=272&action=edit > Compilation errors for t2.c and t3.c > > A BPF needs to include the header to access struct rte_mbuf. > But the current version of the header cannot be included in a > BPF. The attached file shows the errors one gets while compiling the files > examples/bpf/t2.c and examples/bpf/t3.c. a bug was fixed where rte_arch_bswap16 was being hidden except when RTE_FORCE_INTRINSICS was defined. i suspect -t bpf should likely define RTE_FORCE_INTRINSICS since it seems generally unreasonable to have x86 inline asm in a bpf translation unit. if there are problems with RTE_FORCE_INTRINSICS they'll have to be addressed as separate bugs. ty > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug.