From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path:
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098FA454BE;
Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:03:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5AE4027D;
Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:03:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (inbox.dpdk.org [95.142.172.178])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44C540265
for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:03:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id A7162454BF; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:03:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/core Bug 1471] Some rte_pktmbuf functions do not respect
RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 19:03:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK
X-Bugzilla-Component: core
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mb@smartsharesystems.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
References:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=17189966360.e2B4AbCd.3247339
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
--17189966360.e2B4AbCd.3247339
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:03:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1471
Morten Br=C3=B8rup (mb@smartsharesystems.com) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Morten Br=C3=B8rup (mb@smartsharesystems.com) ---
I tend to agree with you on this.
Although older versions of the mbuf library didn't have this restriction for
RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG (which was only used in the header file, and thus
controllable for the application build), RTE_LIBRTE_MEMPOOL_DEBUG works as =
you
describe, so the same could be reasonably assumed about RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEB=
UG.
Let's not consider it a bug.
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=
--17189966360.e2B4AbCd.3247339
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:03:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Morten Br=C3=B8rup changed
bug 1471
I tend to agree with you on this.
Although older versions of the mbuf library didn't have this restriction for
RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG (which was only used in the header file, and thus
controllable for the application build), RTE_LIBRTE_MEMPOOL_DEBUG works as =
you
describe, so the same could be reasonably assumed about RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEB=
UG.
Let's not consider it a bug.