DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [DPDK/testpmd Bug 1479] mlx5: Not able to create rte_flows to match head fragments and sub fragments
@ 2024-07-02 14:21 bugzilla
  2024-07-03  6:19 ` Asaf Penso
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2024-07-02 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4173 bytes --]

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479

            Bug ID: 1479
           Summary: mlx5: Not able to create rte_flows to match head
                    fragments and sub fragments
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 21.11
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: Normal
         Component: testpmd
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: pingtosiva@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---

I am trying to create an RTE flow rule to match head and non-head fragments to
compute NIC RSS based on 5tuple/3tuple respectively on connectX-6 DX NIC and
mlx5 driver. 

As part of it when trying to install RTE flow rule using testpmd on dpdk
21.11/23.07 version, the following errors are thrown.

Flow rule to match head fragment
=================================
testpmd>  flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 fragment_offset spec 0x2000
fragment_offset mask 0x3fff / end actions drop / count / end
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 13 (specific pattern item): cause:
0x7ffd1954c548, match on first fragment not supported: Operation not supported

Flow rule to match non-head fragments
======================================
testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 fragment_offset is 0x2001
fragment_offset last 0x1fff / end actions drop / end
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 11 (item specification range):
cause: 0x7ffc6f629534, specified range not supported: Operation not supported

When I browsed mlx5_flow_dv.c driver file, there are set of conditions
implemented to block this configurations.

Could you kindly help is there a way to compute different RSS hash for
fragments and non-fragments using RTE flow rules on mellanox?

Thanks! in advance.

       /*
         * Match on fragment_offset 0x2000 means MF is 1 and frag-offset is 0,
         * indicating this is 1st fragment of fragmented packet.
         * This is not yet supported in MLX5, return appropriate error message.
         */
        if (fragment_offset_spec == RTE_BE16(RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG))
                return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
                                          RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
                                          "match on first fragment not "
                                          "supported");
        if (fragment_offset_spec && !last)
                return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
                                          RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
                                          "specified value not supported");
        /*
         * Match on fragment_offset spec 0x2001 and last 0x3fff
         * means MF is 1 and frag-offset is > 0.
         * This packet is fragment 2nd and onward, excluding last.
         * This is not yet supported in MLX5, return appropriate
         * error message.
         */
        if (fragment_offset_spec == RTE_BE16(RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG + 1) &&
            fragment_offset_last == RTE_BE16(MLX5_IPV4_FRAG_OFFSET_MASK))
                return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
                                          RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM_LAST,
                                          last, "match on following "
                                          "fragments not supported");
        /*
         * Match on fragment_offset spec 0x0001 and last 0x1fff
         * means MF is 0 and frag-offset is > 0.
         * This packet is last fragment of fragmented packet.
         * This is not yet supported in MLX5, return appropriate
         * error message.
         */
        if (fragment_offset_spec == RTE_BE16(1) &&
            fragment_offset_last == RTE_BE16(RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK))
                return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
                                          RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM_LAST,
                                          last, "match on last "
                                          "fragment not supported");

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6162 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* RE: [DPDK/testpmd Bug 1479] mlx5: Not able to create rte_flows to match head fragments and sub fragments
  2024-07-02 14:21 [DPDK/testpmd Bug 1479] mlx5: Not able to create rte_flows to match head fragments and sub fragments bugzilla
@ 2024-07-03  6:19 ` Asaf Penso
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Asaf Penso @ 2024-07-03  6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bugzilla, dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4920 bytes --]

Hello

Mlx5 pmd supports only these two modes:

  1.  fragment_offset=0x0000 with mask 0xffff means MF is 0 and frag-offset is 0.​
This is an unfragmented packet.​
  2.  fragment_offset spec 0x0001 and last 0x3fff with mask 0xffff, means MF and/or frag-offset is not 0.​
This is a fragmented packet.
To answer your questions, mlx5 doesn’t support match on head fragment and to match on non-head fragment, try mode 2 above.

Regards,
Asaf Penso

From: bugzilla@dpdk.org <bugzilla@dpdk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 2 July 2024 17:21
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/testpmd Bug 1479] mlx5: Not able to create rte_flows to match head fragments and sub fragments

Bug ID
1479<https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479>
Summary
mlx5: Not able to create rte_flows to match head fragments and sub fragments
Product
DPDK
Version
21.11
Hardware
All
OS
All
Status
UNCONFIRMED
Severity
major
Priority
Normal
Component
testpmd
Assignee
dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
Reporter
pingtosiva@gmail.com<mailto:pingtosiva@gmail.com>
Target Milestone
---

I am trying to create an RTE flow rule to match head and non-head fragments to

compute NIC RSS based on 5tuple/3tuple respectively on connectX-6 DX NIC and

mlx5 driver.



As part of it when trying to install RTE flow rule using testpmd on dpdk

21.11/23.07 version, the following errors are thrown.



Flow rule to match head fragment

=================================

testpmd>  flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 fragment_offset spec 0x2000

fragment_offset mask 0x3fff / end actions drop / count / end

port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 13 (specific pattern item): cause:

0x7ffd1954c548, match on first fragment not supported: Operation not supported



Flow rule to match non-head fragments

======================================

testpmd> flow validate 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 fragment_offset is 0x2001

fragment_offset last 0x1fff / end actions drop / end

port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 11 (item specification range):

cause: 0x7ffc6f629534, specified range not supported: Operation not supported



When I browsed mlx5_flow_dv.c driver file, there are set of conditions

implemented to block this configurations.



Could you kindly help is there a way to compute different RSS hash for

fragments and non-fragments using RTE flow rules on mellanox?



Thanks! in advance.



       /*

         * Match on fragment_offset 0x2000 means MF is 1 and frag-offset is 0,

         * indicating this is 1st fragment of fragmented packet.

         * This is not yet supported in MLX5, return appropriate error message.

         */

        if (fragment_offset_spec == RTE_BE16(RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG))

                return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,

                                          RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,

                                          "match on first fragment not "

                                          "supported");

        if (fragment_offset_spec && !last)

                return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,

                                          RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,

                                          "specified value not supported");

        /*

         * Match on fragment_offset spec 0x2001 and last 0x3fff

         * means MF is 1 and frag-offset is > 0.

         * This packet is fragment 2nd and onward, excluding last.

         * This is not yet supported in MLX5, return appropriate

         * error message.

         */

        if (fragment_offset_spec == RTE_BE16(RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG + 1) &&

            fragment_offset_last == RTE_BE16(MLX5_IPV4_FRAG_OFFSET_MASK))

                return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,

                                          RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM_LAST,

                                          last, "match on following "

                                          "fragments not supported");

        /*

         * Match on fragment_offset spec 0x0001 and last 0x1fff

         * means MF is 0 and frag-offset is > 0.

         * This packet is last fragment of fragmented packet.

         * This is not yet supported in MLX5, return appropriate

         * error message.

         */

        if (fragment_offset_spec == RTE_BE16(1) &&

            fragment_offset_last == RTE_BE16(RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK))

                return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,

                                          RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM_LAST,

                                          last, "match on last "

                                          "fragment not supported");



________________________________
You are receiving this mail because:

  *   You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 24083 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-03  6:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-02 14:21 [DPDK/testpmd Bug 1479] mlx5: Not able to create rte_flows to match head fragments and sub fragments bugzilla
2024-07-03  6:19 ` Asaf Penso

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).