From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bugzilla@dpdk.org>
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
 id A40C0288C; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:15:52 +0100 (CET)
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 02:15:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK
X-Bugzilla-Component: mk
X-Bugzilla-Version: 18.11
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: qingfu.cqf@alibaba-inc.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: CONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
 op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
 target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-192-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 192] construct function miss for build with static
	library
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 02:15:52 -0000

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D192

            Bug ID: 192
           Summary: construct function miss for  build with static library
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 18.11
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: CONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: mk
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: qingfu.cqf@alibaba-inc.com
  Target Milestone: ---

I use libdpdk.a to compile a libpmd.so, but I find some construction functi=
on
missed in libpmd.so
There're two file have such issue:
1. drivers/mempool/ring/rte_mempool_ring.c
No function in this file will be call from other place, so if I don't  add =
-Wl,
--whole-archive libdpdk.a  for gcc , then the construction function will no=
t be
generated to libpmd.so
the construction functions are:
MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_mp_mc)
MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_sp_sc)
MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_mp_sc)
MEMPOOL_REGISTER_OPS(ops_sp_mc)

2.  drivers/mempool/stack/rte_mempool_stack.c


Current we can add  -Wl, --whole-archive to workaround, or add a null funct=
ion
in this 2 file, but it looks very stupid.

Thank you

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=