From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 370] Cannot hotplug VFIO devices if VFIO driver was not loaded at init
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:40:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-370-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370
Bug ID: 370
Summary: Cannot hotplug VFIO devices if VFIO driver was not
loaded at init
Product: DPDK
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: core
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Target Milestone: ---
Currently, VFIO device initialization depends upon checking if VFIO is enabled.
That code looks like this:
> int
> rte_vfio_is_enabled(const char *modname)
> {
> const int mod_available = rte_eal_check_module(modname) > 0;
> return default_vfio_cfg->vfio_enabled && mod_available;
> }
The `default_vfio_cfg->vfio_enabled` is set at initialization time with
`rte_vfio_enable` function, and is never rechecked afterwards. This makes it so
that if `vfio` driver was not loaded at EAL initialization time, any subsequent
VFIO device initialization will fail.
To fix that, we would have to re-check the existence of a `vfio` driver every
time, however the current API gets in the way, because even though it stores
global state, it is implemented in a way that looks like it is supposed to be
generic and support multiple driver names (and is never used that way - the
only time this API is used is in the EAL initialization when checking for a
specific `vfio` driver - i think it's a safe assumption to make that whatever
implementation of VFIO is in use, it will depend upon the `vfio` kernel
module).
So, current API will need to be changed (it makes no sense anyway) before this
bug can be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-370-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
--to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).