From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B637EA09F6; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:57:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CEECA32; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:57:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (xvm-172-178.dc0.ghst.net [95.142.172.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9793ACA2C for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:57:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 764BEA09FA; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:57:02 +0100 (CET) From: bugzilla@dpdk.org To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:57:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK X-Bugzilla-Component: core X-Bugzilla-Version: 19.11 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: luca.boccassi@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 585] Direct PCI access violation with VFIO and lockdown mode X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D585 Luca Boccassi (luca.boccassi@gmail.com) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Luca Boccassi (luca.boccassi@gmail.com) --- So Stephen checked all that, and it turns out, while the accesses are coming from the DPDK application, they are actually from a vendor library, not DPD= K. So closing as invalid. Thanks for the tips! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=