DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <jgrajcia@cisco.com>
To: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Damjan Marion (damarion)" <damarion@cisco.com>,
	"Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	"gavin.hu@arm.com" <gavin.hu@arm.com>, "nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/memif: optimized with one-way barrier
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:14:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c041e5b6c5d34632ab29b8c865312b63@XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570586694-18180-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 4:05 AM
> To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
> <jgrajcia@cisco.com>; ferruh.yigit@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Damjan Marion (damarion)
> <damarion@cisco.com>; Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com;
> gavin.hu@arm.com; nd@arm.com
> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/memif: optimized with one-way barrier
> 
> Using 'rte_mb' to synchronize the shared ring head/tail between producer and
> consumer will stall the pipeline and damage performance on the weak
> memory model platform such like AArch64. Meanwhile update the shared
> ring head and tail are observable and ordered between CPUs on IA.
> 
> Optimized this full barrier with the one-way barrier can improve the
> throughput. On AArch64 n1sdp server this patch make testpmd throughput
> boost 2.1%. On Intel E5-2640, testpmd got 3.98% performance gain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> ---
> v2:
> Upgrade 'MEMIF_VERSION_MAJOR' number to 3. (Jakub Grajciar)
> 
> v1:
> Initial version.

I jumped the gun with the version bump. The change doesn't break compatibility. I'm putting reviewed label on v1.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26 11:00 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] " Phil Yang
2019-08-26 11:03 ` Phil Yang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-08 11:05   ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-10-09  2:10     ` Phil Yang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-09 11:17       ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-10-14  8:59         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-09  2:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang
2019-10-09 11:14   ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) [this message]
2019-10-10 14:04     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c041e5b6c5d34632ab29b8c865312b63@XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com \
    --to=jgrajcia@cisco.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=damarion@cisco.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=phil.yang@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).