From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: Qiming Chen <chenqiming_huawei@163.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/iavf: fix mbuf leak
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:27:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c08bae8f021d4772ac81019049e0ae4e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910083138.12867-1-chenqiming_huawei@163.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Qiming Chen
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 4:32 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>;
> Qiming Chen <chenqiming_huawei@163.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/iavf: fix mbuf leak
>
> In the iavf_dev_rx_queue_start function, if the iavf_switch_queue or
> iavf_switch_queue_lv function fails, the previously applied mbuf is not
> released, resulting in leakage. The patch fixes the problem.
>
> Fixes: 9cf9c02bf6ee ("net/iavf: add enable/disable queues for large VF")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiming Chen <chenqiming_huawei@163.com>
> ---
> v2:
> Modify coding style warning.
> ---
> drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c index
> e33fe4576b..55393a9400 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c
> @@ -848,12 +848,14 @@ iavf_dev_rx_queue_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> uint16_t rx_queue_id)
> else
> err = iavf_switch_queue_lv(adapter, rx_queue_id, true, true);
>
> - if (err)
> + if (err) {
> + release_rxq_mbufs(rxq);
This looks good, but I saw another potential memory leak in " alloc_rxq_mbufs",
It is the case when only part of the memory are available, the already allocated mbuf not be released before return -ENOMEM
for (i = 0; i < rxq->nb_rx_desc; i++) {
mbuf = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rxq->mp);
if (unlikely(!mbuf)) {
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to allocate mbuf for RX");
return -ENOMEM;
}
Do you mind to merge them into the same patch? Thanks.
> PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to switch RX queue %u on",
> rx_queue_id);
> - else
> + } else {
> dev->data->rx_queue_state[rx_queue_id] =
> RTE_ETH_QUEUE_STATE_STARTED;
> + }
>
> return err;
> }
> --
> 2.30.1.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-15 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 8:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Qiming Chen
2021-09-10 8:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Qiming Chen
2021-09-15 3:27 ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2021-09-16 14:04 ` Qiming Chen
2021-09-22 7:04 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c08bae8f021d4772ac81019049e0ae4e@intel.com \
--to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=chenqiming_huawei@163.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).