DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>,
	"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"David Christensen" <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>,
	"Honnappa Nagarahalli" <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] net/i40e: remove redundant number of packets check
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 01:23:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0cf78d357ba44bf88ba879d5b14a492@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7801f1ec-a501-62d4-48aa-cc2729c78ca9@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2022 12:44 AM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>;
> Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; David Christensen
> <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>;
> Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd@arm.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>; David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/i40e: remove redundant number of packets check
> 
> On 3/3/2022 2:28 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 9:54 AM
> >> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; David Christensen
> >> <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> >> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd@arm.com; Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>;
> >> Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH v1] net/i40e: remove redundant number of packets
> >> check
> >>
> >> For i40e_xmit_pkts_vec_xx function, it checks nb_pkts to ensure
> >> nb_pkts does not cross rs_thresh.
> >>
> >> However, in i40e_xmit_fixed_burst_vec_xx function, this check will be
> >> performed again. To improve code, delete this redundant check.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> >
> > Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
> >
> 
> Hi Qi,
> 
> This patch is not acked by the i40e maintainers.
> 
> And this is changing the datapath for the -rc3, two weeks before the release. Is
> it tested enough?
> 
> What is the gain with this patch, I don't see any numbers in the commit log.
> If the gain is small, can we postpone this patch to next release instead of getting
> it for -rc3?

The patch applied the same thing as below which I have reviewed.
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220222224818.8612-1-kathleen.capella@arm.com/

I didn't see the risk of having it, and I will add a "reviewed-by" to avoid confusion, but if you think it's risky, we can still defer it to next-net.

Thanks
Qi

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-03  1:53 Feifei Wang
2022-03-03  2:28 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-03-03 16:43   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-03-04  1:23     ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2022-03-04  6:01       ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-03-04 11:10       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-03-24  8:54         ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-03-04  1:24 ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0cf78d357ba44bf88ba879d5b14a492@intel.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).