From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CB0A04C1;
	Mon, 25 Nov 2019 03:56:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9D92C6A;
	Mon, 25 Nov 2019 03:56:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dpdk.org (unknown [49.7.44.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83663CF3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 03:56:12 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 s=s2019; d=bytedance.com; t=1574650571; x=1574654171; l=50; h=from:to:
 message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type;
 bh=U+6msHeE92i9d8bVjtjCOvIdL7lzZH9KwmwhmxXlELQ=;
 b=aCSTBM3dDxcVbK0PW1ceSv0nNQRUdjLjYbz4r++8ajYfHsRreK4/2/JALFfjVFT6V9bdhL
 X4MlshDRTXgLKR9O7/5nojikqfMvw5jKkArhEDUJqBqlvubpfuQdCcQgoZfnpb8hWV3+JQ
 QPga42Cjv3ppu4PXNQhgXrac5lmiBf2saCMSsuOC7ILBdm/LPxYEXPjFU6VD4ni+XRKxsm
 ayck9xZKbctbHZaYCn+11EA6TbznbMMoAYdxy/cPcRgE71NyfpM3SbrMQVE6eJ5MVC4QLJ
 +KSGVsDOaC9odPq7RsfYQJq93QCCPC/OBUy+HF/aqlYGxqEoN10rm0ChclywsA==
To: "matan@mellanox.com" <matan@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "viacheslavo@mellanox.com" <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
From: =?utf-8?q?=E8=B4=BA=E9=B9=8F?= <hepeng.0320@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:56:01 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <c1596ea907d851ffbd1575ff29659e6991aff8dd.d2106bfd.06c9.4261.bda5.7da50d696762@feishu.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] the default rule makes VF rep cannot get packets even if
	there is no offload rules
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi,=C2=A0

We found the patch "net/mlx5: revert default rules amount optimization",=C2=
=A0
which installs a rule directing all egress traffic from VF to table 1, resu=
lts in=C2=A0
VF representors get no packets, even if there is no offload rules installed=
.=C2=A0


I guess, if there is no rule indicating table 1, the table 1 does not exist=
,=C2=A0
so all packets will be dropped?=C2=A0

PF works just fine.=C2=A0

We are using dpdk 19.11-rc3 for evaluation.