From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D0CA04B1; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:37:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D7B1C1AC; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:37:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com (mail-wm1-f67.google.com [209.85.128.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC6B1C1AB; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:37:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id s13so4692968wmh.4; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:37:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4IAR6ZfFGrjZYARW52ssgHQcqfzjynMXCBI7fsp+Kvc=; b=TGlguWjMuW6wYZH9NTvZ0QrY082SQQScBnIZR1y2oEvX0bfWQcnKqsWVpqqUe+PWnN 26q8nAixHFZrWGlziY/bfP0jr47fxKZYMX4SggCxp5XoWzTBJ/3JIN+uBFctATXmwTZf Fg/SRN3Pk5ijfPAawWmKWGVHYExuQuoVYGmPDfGznMliInQjOLRSGUg4bsv149mWsylR PtyvWo9K/1nOWOjmPxA7TrRxxJlp9+4u9MuFdWkST0a5MUhJYlyrvsrZ8hbrKsye1yLY URsRLW4sOYmLIaKQl8QI5sUkbf0lPosCNv0U5+CaPbAyBfkY9NhOdtlXS9T8EKwfcM1l AyVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531AVUXvgh2K8bNIoKjZ46Lj3jnKRNKUDsAJmlNUd73x37evkB7S Dyr5r1nKVUuKa8xbCAZJ0M4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3B4OgFfJ+kLLAecO7LGZS1M6nFW5wUdjFle9tVLtJN227xSiLWPw5jcHxD4Je6UaZxj5yIA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:10cf:: with SMTP id l15mr11459201wmd.149.1598524627860; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v29sm5100217wrv.51.2020.08.27.03.37.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 03:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Luca Boccassi To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "stable@dpdk.org" , "Chen, BoX C" Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:37:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <45bd96a0-b8d6-ea77-68ea-1a2d6f016051@intel.com> References: <20200818181222.8462-1-bluca@debian.org> <5e4efca917b88a9f6983229369547a1f410a110b.camel@debian.org> <45bd96a0-b8d6-ea77-68ea-1a2d6f016051@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.4 patches review and test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 10:47 +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > On 26-Aug-20 10:50 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 02:30 +0000, Chen, BoX C wrote: > > > Hi Luca, > > > Update LTS 19.11.4 test result for Intel part. No new issue is found = except known issues. > >=20 > > Thank you! > >=20 > > > * Intel(R) Testing > > >=20 > > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > > > * PF(i40e):Passed > > > - Exception message when starting testpmd for testing external m= emory. It has been fixed on 20.05.patch link: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch= /66041/ > >=20 > > Anatoly, is it safe to backport this patch to 19.11? It applies and > > builds cleanly when cherry-picked: > >=20 > > d1c7c0cdf7ba ("vfio: map contiguous areas in one go") >=20 > Hi Luca, >=20 > Yes, it should be safe - at least i'm not aware of any breakages ever=20 > being reported so far. Thanks! Could you please double-check that there's no other patch/change that depends on it/that it depends on and is missing from 19.11.4-rc1? Given we wouldn't redo the full regression run, we need to be careful --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi