From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dwilder@us.ibm.com>
Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com
 [148.163.158.5]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB66A91
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 00:53:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
 by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id
 wAGNnLuD070269 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:53:07 -0500
Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154])
 by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2nt6rft9bh-1
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:53:07 -0500
Received: from localhost
 by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
 Violators will be prosecuted
 for <dev@dpdk.org> from <dwilder@us.ibm.com>;
 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:53:07 -0000
Received: from b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.16)
 by e36.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.136) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized
 Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; 
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256)
 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:53:04 -0000
Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com
 (b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.236])
 by b03cxnp07029.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
 wAGNr3gX19529734
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);
 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:53:03 GMT
Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78CFBE051;
 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:53:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACD1BE054;
 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:53:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ltc.linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.16.170.189])
 by b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:53:03 +0000 (GMT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:56:07 -0800
From: dwilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, pradeep@us.ibm.com,
 chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com
In-Reply-To: <df26df26-6245-10d0-51e7-a03678f5da81@intel.com>
References: <20181114204051.9580-1-dwilder@us.ibm.com>
 <df26df26-6245-10d0-51e7-a03678f5da81@intel.com>
X-Sender: dwilder@us.ibm.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.1
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
x-cbid: 18111623-0020-0000-0000-00000E8AFFFD
X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: 
X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010064; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007;
 PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000270; SDB=6.01118491; UDB=6.00580222; IPR=6.00898600; 
 MB=3.00024199; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-11-16 23:53:06
X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused
x-cbparentid: 18111623-0021-0000-0000-000063BCDA26
Message-Id: <c27f600ce7c40a05d732e2d6e6812c94@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, ,
 definitions=2018-11-16_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0
 priorityscore=1501
 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0
 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0
 mlxlogscore=917 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1811160211
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mem: Fix anonymous mapping on Power9.
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:53:09 -0000

On 2018-11-15 07:11, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 14-Nov-18 8:40 PM, David Wilder wrote:
> 
>> Please include this patch in 18.11 as well, this patch is not suitable
>> for 17.11.
>> Small note: while this patch is not suitable for 17.11 as is, it can 
>> be made suitable if you drop the memalloc part. I copied this flag 
>> from old memory allocation code, so if 17.11 has this flag there, you 
>> can fix it in 17.11 as well.

Thank you

I am working on a 17.11 fix as well,  the issue is a little different on 
17.11 but removing the flag is indeed part of the fix.