DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Jiayu Hu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: i.maximets@ovn.org, chenbo.xia@intel.com, xuan.ding@intel.com,
	cheng1.jiang@intel.com, liangma@liangbit.com,
	Sunil Pai G <sunil.pai.g@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vhost: integrate dmadev in asynchronous data-path
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:46:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2b1ef43-bd67-e578-aad3-6f412deff39f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208104031.1885640-2-jiayu.hu@intel.com>

Hi Jiayu,

On 2/8/22 11:40, Jiayu Hu wrote:
> Since dmadev is introduced in 21.11, to avoid the overhead of vhost DMA
> abstraction layer and simplify application logics, this patch integrates
> dmadev in asynchronous data path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiayu Hu <jiayu.hu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Pai G <sunil.pai.g@intel.com>
> ---
>   doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst |  97 +++++-----
>   examples/vhost/Makefile             |   2 +-
>   examples/vhost/ioat.c               | 218 ----------------------
>   examples/vhost/ioat.h               |  63 -------
>   examples/vhost/main.c               | 252 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   examples/vhost/main.h               |  11 ++
>   examples/vhost/meson.build          |   6 +-
>   lib/vhost/meson.build               |   2 +-
>   lib/vhost/rte_vhost.h               |   2 +
>   lib/vhost/rte_vhost_async.h         | 145 ++++-----------
>   lib/vhost/version.map               |   3 +
>   lib/vhost/vhost.c                   | 122 +++++++++----
>   lib/vhost/vhost.h                   |  85 ++++++++-
>   lib/vhost/virtio_net.c              | 271 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   14 files changed, 689 insertions(+), 590 deletions(-)
>   delete mode 100644 examples/vhost/ioat.c
>   delete mode 100644 examples/vhost/ioat.h

Thanks for the quick follow-up patch.

I notice checkpatch is complaining for a few too long lines, I can fix
them by myself if the rest is good, otherwise remember to run checkpatch
for the next iteration.

> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
>   #include "vhost.h"
>   #include "vhost_user.h"
>   
> -struct virtio_net *vhost_devices[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
> +struct virtio_net *vhost_devices[RTE_MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
>   pthread_mutex_t vhost_dev_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
>   
>   /* Called with iotlb_lock read-locked */
> @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ vhost_free_async_mem(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>   		return;
>   
>   	rte_free(vq->async->pkts_info);
> +	rte_free(vq->async->pkts_cmpl_flag);
>   
>   	rte_free(vq->async->buffers_packed);
>   	vq->async->buffers_packed = NULL;
> @@ -665,12 +666,12 @@ vhost_new_device(void)
>   	int i;
>   
>   	pthread_mutex_lock(&vhost_dev_lock);
> -	for (i = 0; i < MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_VHOST_DEVICE; i++) {
>   		if (vhost_devices[i] == NULL)
>   			break;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (i == MAX_VHOST_DEVICE) {
> +	if (i == RTE_MAX_VHOST_DEVICE) {
>   		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "failed to find a free slot for new device.\n");
>   		pthread_mutex_unlock(&vhost_dev_lock);
>   		return -1;
> @@ -1621,8 +1622,7 @@ rte_vhost_extern_callback_register(int vid,
>   }
>   
>   static __rte_always_inline int
> -async_channel_register(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
> -		struct rte_vhost_async_channel_ops *ops)
> +async_channel_register(int vid, uint16_t queue_id)
>   {
>   	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
>   	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = dev->virtqueue[queue_id];
> @@ -1651,6 +1651,14 @@ async_channel_register(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		goto out_free_async;
>   	}
>   
> +	async->pkts_cmpl_flag = rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, vq->size * sizeof(bool), RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
> +			node);
> +	if (!async->pkts_cmpl_flag) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "(%s) failed to allocate async pkts_cmpl_flag (qid: %d)\n",
> +				dev->ifname, queue_id);
> +		goto out_free_async;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (vq_is_packed(dev)) {
>   		async->buffers_packed = rte_malloc_socket(NULL,
>   				vq->size * sizeof(struct vring_used_elem_packed),
> @@ -1671,9 +1679,6 @@ async_channel_register(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	async->ops.check_completed_copies = ops->check_completed_copies;
> -	async->ops.transfer_data = ops->transfer_data;
> -
>   	vq->async = async;
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -1686,15 +1691,13 @@ async_channel_register(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>   }
>   
>   int
> -rte_vhost_async_channel_register(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
> -		struct rte_vhost_async_config config,
> -		struct rte_vhost_async_channel_ops *ops)
> +rte_vhost_async_channel_register(int vid, uint16_t queue_id)
>   {
>   	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
>   	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	if (dev == NULL || ops == NULL)
> +	if (dev == NULL)
>   		return -1;
>   
>   	if (queue_id >= VHOST_MAX_VRING)
> @@ -1705,33 +1708,20 @@ rte_vhost_async_channel_register(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>   	if (unlikely(vq == NULL || !dev->async_copy))
>   		return -1;
>   
> -	if (unlikely(!(config.features & RTE_VHOST_ASYNC_INORDER))) {
> -		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR,
> -			"(%s) async copy is not supported on non-inorder mode (qid: %d)\n",
> -			dev->ifname, queue_id);
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (unlikely(ops->check_completed_copies == NULL ||
> -		ops->transfer_data == NULL))
> -		return -1;
> -
>   	rte_spinlock_lock(&vq->access_lock);
> -	ret = async_channel_register(vid, queue_id, ops);
> +	ret = async_channel_register(vid, queue_id);
>   	rte_spinlock_unlock(&vq->access_lock);
>   
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   int
> -rte_vhost_async_channel_register_thread_unsafe(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
> -		struct rte_vhost_async_config config,
> -		struct rte_vhost_async_channel_ops *ops)
> +rte_vhost_async_channel_register_thread_unsafe(int vid, uint16_t queue_id)
>   {
>   	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
>   	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
>   
> -	if (dev == NULL || ops == NULL)
> +	if (dev == NULL)
>   		return -1;
>   
>   	if (queue_id >= VHOST_MAX_VRING)
> @@ -1742,18 +1732,7 @@ rte_vhost_async_channel_register_thread_unsafe(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>   	if (unlikely(vq == NULL || !dev->async_copy))
>   		return -1;
>   
> -	if (unlikely(!(config.features & RTE_VHOST_ASYNC_INORDER))) {
> -		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR,
> -			"(%s) async copy is not supported on non-inorder mode (qid: %d)\n",
> -			dev->ifname, queue_id);
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (unlikely(ops->check_completed_copies == NULL ||
> -		ops->transfer_data == NULL))
> -		return -1;
> -
> -	return async_channel_register(vid, queue_id, ops);
> +	return async_channel_register(vid, queue_id);
>   }
>   
>   int
> @@ -1832,6 +1811,69 @@ rte_vhost_async_channel_unregister_thread_unsafe(int vid, uint16_t queue_id)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +int
> +rte_vhost_async_dma_configure(int16_t dma_id, uint16_t vchan_id)
> +{
> +	struct rte_dma_info info;
> +	void *pkts_cmpl_flag_addr;
> +	uint16_t max_desc;
> +
> +	if (!rte_dma_is_valid(dma_id)) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "DMA %d is not found. Cannot use it in vhost\n", dma_id);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	rte_dma_info_get(dma_id, &info);
> +	if (vchan_id >= info.max_vchans) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "Invalid vChannel ID. Cannot use DMA %d vChannel %u for "
> +				"vhost\n", dma_id, vchan_id);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans) {
> +		struct async_dma_vchan_info *vchans;
> +
> +		vchans = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(struct async_dma_vchan_info) * info.max_vchans,
> +				RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> +		if (vchans == NULL) {
> +			VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "Failed to allocate vchans, Cannot use DMA %d "
> +					"vChannel %u for vhost.\n", dma_id, vchan_id);

Please remove the "cannot use in Vhost" here and above and below.
The messages are already prefixed with VHOST_CONFIG, so this is
redundant.

> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +
> +		dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans = vchans;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id].pkts_cmpl_flag_addr) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(INFO, "DMA %d vChannel %u has registered in vhost. Ignore\n",

"DMA %d vChannel %u already registered.\n"

> +				dma_id, vchan_id);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	max_desc = info.max_desc;
> +	if (!rte_is_power_of_2(max_desc))
> +		max_desc = rte_align32pow2(max_desc);
> +
> +	pkts_cmpl_flag_addr = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(bool *) * max_desc, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> +	if (!pkts_cmpl_flag_addr) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "Failed to allocate pkts_cmpl_flag_addr for DMA %d "
> +				"vChannel %u. Cannot use it for vhost\n", dma_id, vchan_id);
> +
> +		if (dma_copy_track[dma_id].nr_vchans == 0) {
> +			rte_free(dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans);
> +			dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans = NULL;
> +		}
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id].pkts_cmpl_flag_addr = pkts_cmpl_flag_addr;
> +	dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id].ring_size = max_desc;
> +	dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id].ring_mask = max_desc - 1;
> +	dma_copy_track[dma_id].nr_vchans++;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   int
>   rte_vhost_async_get_inflight(int vid, uint16_t queue_id)
>   {
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost.h b/lib/vhost/vhost.h
> index b3f0c1d07c..1c2ee29600 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>   #include <rte_ether.h>
>   #include <rte_rwlock.h>
>   #include <rte_malloc.h>
> +#include <rte_dmadev.h>
>   
>   #include "rte_vhost.h"
>   #include "rte_vdpa.h"
> @@ -50,6 +51,9 @@
>   
>   #define VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_IT (MAX_PKT_BURST)
>   #define VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC 2048
> +#define VIRTIO_MAX_RX_PKTLEN 9728U
> +#define VHOST_DMA_MAX_COPY_COMPLETE ((VIRTIO_MAX_RX_PKTLEN / RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_DATAROOM) \
> +		* MAX_PKT_BURST)
>   
>   #define PACKED_DESC_ENQUEUE_USED_FLAG(w)	\
>   	((w) ? (VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL | VRING_DESC_F_USED | VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) : \
> @@ -119,6 +123,58 @@ struct vring_used_elem_packed {
>   	uint32_t count;
>   };
>   
> +/**
> + * iovec
> + */
> +struct vhost_iovec {
> +	void *src_addr;
> +	void *dst_addr;
> +	size_t len;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * iovec iterator
> + */
> +struct vhost_iov_iter {
> +	/** pointer to the iovec array */
> +	struct vhost_iovec *iov;
> +	/** number of iovec in this iterator */
> +	unsigned long nr_segs;
> +};
> +
> +struct async_dma_vchan_info {
> +	/* circular array to track if packet copy completes */
> +	bool **pkts_cmpl_flag_addr;
> +
> +	/* max elements in 'pkts_cmpl_flag_addr' */
> +	uint16_t ring_size;
> +	/* ring index mask for 'pkts_cmpl_flag_addr' */
> +	uint16_t ring_mask;
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * DMA virtual channel lock. Although it is able to bind DMA
> +	 * virtual channels to data plane threads, vhost control plane
> +	 * thread could call data plane functions too, thus causing
> +	 * DMA device contention.
> +	 *
> +	 * For example, in VM exit case, vhost control plane thread needs
> +	 * to clear in-flight packets before disable vring, but there could
> +	 * be anotther data plane thread is enqueuing packets to the same
> +	 * vring with the same DMA virtual channel. As dmadev PMD functions
> +	 * are lock-free, the control plane and data plane threads could
> +	 * operate the same DMA virtual channel at the same time.
> +	 */
> +	rte_spinlock_t dma_lock;
> +};
> +
> +struct async_dma_info {
> +	struct async_dma_vchan_info *vchans;
> +	/* number of registered virtual channels */
> +	uint16_t nr_vchans;
> +};
> +
> +extern struct async_dma_info dma_copy_track[RTE_DMADEV_DEFAULT_MAX];
> +
>   /**
>    * inflight async packet information
>    */
> @@ -129,16 +185,32 @@ struct async_inflight_info {
>   };
>   
>   struct vhost_async {
> -	/* operation callbacks for DMA */
> -	struct rte_vhost_async_channel_ops ops;
> -
> -	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter iov_iter[VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_IT];
> -	struct rte_vhost_iovec iovec[VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC];
> +	struct vhost_iov_iter iov_iter[VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_IT];
> +	struct vhost_iovec iovec[VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC];
>   	uint16_t iter_idx;
>   	uint16_t iovec_idx;
>   
>   	/* data transfer status */
>   	struct async_inflight_info *pkts_info;
> +	/**
> +	 * Packet reorder array. "true" indicates that DMA device
> +	 * completes all copies for the packet.
> +	 *
> +	 * Note that this array could be written by multiple threads
> +	 * simultaneously. For example, in the case of thread0 and
> +	 * thread1 RX packets from NIC and then enqueue packets to
> +	 * vring0 and vring1 with own DMA device DMA0 and DMA1, it's
> +	 * possible for thread0 to get completed copies belonging to
> +	 * vring1 from DMA0, while thread0 is calling rte_vhost_poll
> +	 * _enqueue_completed() for vring0 and thread1 is calling
> +	 * rte_vhost_submit_enqueue_burst() for vring1. In this case,
> +	 * vq->access_lock cannot protect pkts_cmpl_flag of vring1.
> +	 *
> +	 * However, since offloading is per-packet basis, each packet
> +	 * flag will only be written by one thread. And single byte
> +	 * write is atomic, so no lock for pkts_cmpl_flag is needed.
> +	 */
> +	bool *pkts_cmpl_flag;
>   	uint16_t pkts_idx;
>   	uint16_t pkts_inflight_n;
>   	union {
> @@ -568,8 +640,7 @@ extern int vhost_data_log_level;
>   #define PRINT_PACKET(device, addr, size, header) do {} while (0)
>   #endif
>   
> -#define MAX_VHOST_DEVICE	1024
> -extern struct virtio_net *vhost_devices[MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
> +extern struct virtio_net *vhost_devices[RTE_MAX_VHOST_DEVICE];
>   
>   #define VHOST_BINARY_SEARCH_THRESH 256
>   
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c
> index f19713137c..cc4e2504ac 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>   #include <rte_net.h>
>   #include <rte_ether.h>
>   #include <rte_ip.h>
> +#include <rte_dmadev.h>
>   #include <rte_vhost.h>
>   #include <rte_tcp.h>
>   #include <rte_udp.h>
> @@ -25,6 +26,9 @@
>   
>   #define MAX_BATCH_LEN 256
>   
> +/* DMA device copy operation tracking array. */
> +struct async_dma_info dma_copy_track[RTE_DMADEV_DEFAULT_MAX];
> +
>   static  __rte_always_inline bool
>   rxvq_is_mergeable(struct virtio_net *dev)
>   {
> @@ -43,6 +47,136 @@ is_valid_virt_queue_idx(uint32_t idx, int is_tx, uint32_t nr_vring)
>   	return (is_tx ^ (idx & 1)) == 0 && idx < nr_vring;
>   }
>   
> +static __rte_always_inline int64_t
> +vhost_async_dma_transfer_one(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +		int16_t dma_id, uint16_t vchan_id, uint16_t flag_idx,
> +		struct vhost_iov_iter *pkt)
> +{
> +	struct async_dma_vchan_info *dma_info = &dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id];
> +	uint16_t ring_mask = dma_info->ring_mask;
> +	static bool vhost_async_dma_copy_log;
> +
> +
> +	struct vhost_iovec *iov = pkt->iov;
> +	int copy_idx = 0;
> +	uint32_t nr_segs = pkt->nr_segs;
> +	uint16_t i;
> +
> +	if (rte_dma_burst_capacity(dma_id, vchan_id) < nr_segs)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_segs; i++) {
> +		copy_idx = rte_dma_copy(dma_id, vchan_id, (rte_iova_t)iov[i].src_addr,
> +				(rte_iova_t)iov[i].dst_addr, iov[i].len, RTE_DMA_OP_FLAG_LLC);
> +		/**
> +		 * Since all memory is pinned and DMA vChannel
> +		 * ring has enough space, failure should be a
> +		 * rare case. If failure happens, it means DMA
> +		 * device encounters serious errors; in this
> +		 * case, please stop async data-path and check
> +		 * what has happened to DMA device.
> +		 */
> +		if (unlikely(copy_idx < 0)) {
> +			if (!vhost_async_dma_copy_log) {
> +				VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "(%s) DMA %d vChannel %u reports error in "
> +						"rte_dma_copy(). Please stop async data-path and "
> +						"debug what has happened to DMA device\n",

Please try to maje the log message shorter.

Something like "DMA copy failed for channel <dev id>:<chan id>".

> +						dev->ifname, dma_id, vchan_id);
> +				vhost_async_dma_copy_log = true;
> +			}
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * Only store packet completion flag address in the last copy's
> +	 * slot, and other slots are set to NULL.
> +	 */
> +	dma_info->pkts_cmpl_flag_addr[copy_idx & ring_mask] = &vq->async->pkts_cmpl_flag[flag_idx];
> +
> +	return nr_segs;
> +}
> +
> +static __rte_always_inline uint16_t
> +vhost_async_dma_transfer(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +		int16_t dma_id, uint16_t vchan_id, uint16_t head_idx,
> +		struct vhost_iov_iter *pkts, uint16_t nr_pkts)
> +{
> +	struct async_dma_vchan_info *dma_info = &dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id];
> +	int64_t ret, nr_copies = 0;
> +	uint16_t pkt_idx;
> +
> +	rte_spinlock_lock(&dma_info->dma_lock);
> +
> +	for (pkt_idx = 0; pkt_idx < nr_pkts; pkt_idx++) {
> +		ret = vhost_async_dma_transfer_one(dev, vq, dma_id, vchan_id, head_idx, &pkts[pkt_idx]);
> +		if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> +			break;
> +
> +		nr_copies += ret;
> +		head_idx++;
> +		if (head_idx >= vq->size)
> +			head_idx -= vq->size;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (likely(nr_copies > 0))
> +		rte_dma_submit(dma_id, vchan_id);
> +
> +	rte_spinlock_unlock(&dma_info->dma_lock);
> +
> +	return pkt_idx;
> +}

Thanks for reworking vhost_async_dma_transfer()!It is much cleaner &
easy to understand IMHO.

> +static __rte_always_inline uint16_t
> +vhost_async_dma_check_completed(struct virtio_net *dev, int16_t dma_id, uint16_t vchan_id,
> +		uint16_t max_pkts)
> +{
> +	struct async_dma_vchan_info *dma_info = &dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id];
> +	uint16_t ring_mask = dma_info->ring_mask;
> +	uint16_t last_idx = 0;
> +	uint16_t nr_copies;
> +	uint16_t copy_idx;
> +	uint16_t i;
> +	bool has_error = false;
> +	static bool vhost_async_dma_complete_log;
> +
> +	rte_spinlock_lock(&dma_info->dma_lock);
> +
> +	/**
> +	 * Print error log for debugging, if DMA reports error during
> +	 * DMA transfer. We do not handle error in vhost level.
> +	 */
> +	nr_copies = rte_dma_completed(dma_id, vchan_id, max_pkts, &last_idx, &has_error);
> +	if (unlikely(!vhost_async_dma_complete_log && has_error)) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "(%s) DMA %d vChannel %u reports error in "
> +				"rte_dma_completed()\n", dev->ifname, dma_id, vchan_id);

"(%s) DMA completion failure on channel %d:%d"

> +		vhost_async_dma_complete_log = true;
> +	} else if (nr_copies == 0) {
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	copy_idx = last_idx - nr_copies + 1;
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_copies; i++) {
> +		bool *flag;
> +
> +		flag = dma_info->pkts_cmpl_flag_addr[copy_idx & ring_mask];
> +		if (flag) {
> +			/**
> +			 * Mark the packet flag as received. The flag
> +			 * could belong to another virtqueue but write
> +			 * is atomic.
> +			 */
> +			*flag = true;
> +			dma_info->pkts_cmpl_flag_addr[copy_idx & ring_mask] = NULL;
> +		}
> +		copy_idx++;
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	rte_spinlock_unlock(&dma_info->dma_lock);
> +	return nr_copies;
> +}
> +
>   static inline void
>   do_data_copy_enqueue(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>   {
> @@ -794,7 +928,7 @@ copy_vnet_hdr_to_desc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>   static __rte_always_inline int
>   async_iter_initialize(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_async *async)
>   {
> -	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *iter;
> +	struct vhost_iov_iter *iter;
>   
>   	if (unlikely(async->iovec_idx >= VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC)) {
>   		VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "(%s) no more async iovec available\n", dev->ifname);
> @@ -812,8 +946,8 @@ static __rte_always_inline int
>   async_iter_add_iovec(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_async *async,
>   		void *src, void *dst, size_t len)
>   {
> -	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *iter;
> -	struct rte_vhost_iovec *iovec;
> +	struct vhost_iov_iter *iter;
> +	struct vhost_iovec *iovec;
>   
>   	if (unlikely(async->iovec_idx >= VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC)) {
>   		static bool vhost_max_async_vec_log;
> @@ -848,7 +982,7 @@ async_iter_finalize(struct vhost_async *async)
>   static __rte_always_inline void
>   async_iter_cancel(struct vhost_async *async)
>   {
> -	struct rte_vhost_iov_iter *iter;
> +	struct vhost_iov_iter *iter;
>   
>   	iter = async->iov_iter + async->iter_idx;
>   	async->iovec_idx -= iter->nr_segs;
> @@ -1448,9 +1582,9 @@ store_dma_desc_info_packed(struct vring_used_elem_packed *s_ring,
>   }
>   
>   static __rte_noinline uint32_t
> -virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_split(struct virtio_net *dev,
> -	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, uint16_t queue_id,
> -	struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint32_t count)
> +virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_split(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +		uint16_t queue_id, struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint32_t count,
> +		int16_t dma_id, uint16_t vchan_id)
>   {
>   	struct buf_vector buf_vec[BUF_VECTOR_MAX];
>   	uint32_t pkt_idx = 0;
> @@ -1460,7 +1594,7 @@ virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_split(struct virtio_net *dev,
>   	struct vhost_async *async = vq->async;
>   	struct async_inflight_info *pkts_info = async->pkts_info;
>   	uint32_t pkt_err = 0;
> -	int32_t n_xfer;
> +	uint16_t n_xfer;
>   	uint16_t slot_idx = 0;
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -1502,17 +1636,16 @@ virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_split(struct virtio_net *dev,
>   	if (unlikely(pkt_idx == 0))
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	n_xfer = async->ops.transfer_data(dev->vid, queue_id, async->iov_iter, 0, pkt_idx);
> -	if (unlikely(n_xfer < 0)) {
> -		VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "(%s) %s: failed to transfer data for queue id %d.\n",
> -				dev->ifname, __func__, queue_id);
> -		n_xfer = 0;
> -	}
> +	n_xfer = vhost_async_dma_transfer(dev, vq, dma_id, vchan_id, async->pkts_idx,
> +			async->iov_iter, pkt_idx);
>   
>   	pkt_err = pkt_idx - n_xfer;
>   	if (unlikely(pkt_err)) {
>   		uint16_t num_descs = 0;
>   
> +		VHOST_LOG_DATA(DEBUG, "(%s) %s: failed to transfer %u packets for queue %u.\n",
> +				dev->ifname, __func__, pkt_err, queue_id);
> +
>   		/* update number of completed packets */
>   		pkt_idx = n_xfer;
>   
> @@ -1655,13 +1788,13 @@ dma_error_handler_packed(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, uint16_t slot_idx,
>   }
>   
>   static __rte_noinline uint32_t
> -virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
> -	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, uint16_t queue_id,
> -	struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint32_t count)
> +virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> +		uint16_t queue_id, struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint32_t count,
> +		int16_t dma_id, uint16_t vchan_id)
>   {
>   	uint32_t pkt_idx = 0;
>   	uint32_t remained = count;
> -	int32_t n_xfer;
> +	uint16_t n_xfer;
>   	uint16_t num_buffers;
>   	uint16_t num_descs;
>   
> @@ -1693,19 +1826,17 @@ virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>   	if (unlikely(pkt_idx == 0))
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	n_xfer = async->ops.transfer_data(dev->vid, queue_id, async->iov_iter, 0, pkt_idx);
> -	if (unlikely(n_xfer < 0)) {
> -		VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "(%s) %s: failed to transfer data for queue id %d.\n",
> -				dev->ifname, __func__, queue_id);
> -		n_xfer = 0;
> -	}
> -
> -	pkt_err = pkt_idx - n_xfer;
> +	n_xfer = vhost_async_dma_transfer(dev, vq, dma_id, vchan_id, async->pkts_idx, async->iov_iter,
> +			pkt_idx);
>   
>   	async_iter_reset(async);
>   
> -	if (unlikely(pkt_err))
> +	pkt_err = pkt_idx - n_xfer;
> +	if (unlikely(pkt_err)) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_DATA(DEBUG, "(%s) %s: failed to transfer %u packets for queue %u.\n",
> +				dev->ifname, __func__, pkt_err, queue_id);
>   		dma_error_handler_packed(vq, slot_idx, pkt_err, &pkt_idx);
> +	}
>   
>   	if (likely(vq->shadow_used_idx)) {
>   		/* keep used descriptors. */
> @@ -1825,28 +1956,40 @@ write_back_completed_descs_packed(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>   
>   static __rte_always_inline uint16_t
>   vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(struct virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> -		struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint16_t count)
> +		struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint16_t count, int16_t dma_id,
> +		uint16_t vchan_id)
>   {
>   	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = dev->virtqueue[queue_id];
>   	struct vhost_async *async = vq->async;
>   	struct async_inflight_info *pkts_info = async->pkts_info;
> -	int32_t n_cpl;
> +	uint16_t nr_cpl_pkts = 0;
>   	uint16_t n_descs = 0, n_buffers = 0;
>   	uint16_t start_idx, from, i;
>   
> -	n_cpl = async->ops.check_completed_copies(dev->vid, queue_id, 0, count);
> -	if (unlikely(n_cpl < 0)) {
> -		VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "(%s) %s: failed to check completed copies for queue id %d.\n",
> -				dev->ifname, __func__, queue_id);
> -		return 0;
> +	/* Check completed copies for the given DMA vChannel */
> +	vhost_async_dma_check_completed(dev, dma_id, vchan_id, VHOST_DMA_MAX_COPY_COMPLETE);
> +
> +	start_idx = async_get_first_inflight_pkt_idx(vq);
> +	/**
> +	 * Calculate the number of copy completed packets.
> +	 * Note that there may be completed packets even if
> +	 * no copies are reported done by the given DMA vChannel。
> +	 * For example, multiple data plane threads enqueue packets
> +	 * to the same virtqueue with their own DMA vChannels.
> +	 */
> +	from = start_idx;
> +	while (vq->async->pkts_cmpl_flag[from] && count--) {
> +		vq->async->pkts_cmpl_flag[from] = false;
> +		from++;
> +		if (from >= vq->size)
> +			from -= vq->size;
> +		nr_cpl_pkts++;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (n_cpl == 0)
> +	if (nr_cpl_pkts == 0)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	start_idx = async_get_first_inflight_pkt_idx(vq);
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < n_cpl; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpl_pkts; i++) {
>   		from = (start_idx + i) % vq->size;
>   		/* Only used with packed ring */
>   		n_buffers += pkts_info[from].nr_buffers;
> @@ -1855,7 +1998,7 @@ vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(struct virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		pkts[i] = pkts_info[from].mbuf;
>   	}
>   
> -	async->pkts_inflight_n -= n_cpl;
> +	async->pkts_inflight_n -= nr_cpl_pkts;
>   
>   	if (likely(vq->enabled && vq->access_ok)) {
>   		if (vq_is_packed(dev)) {
> @@ -1876,12 +2019,13 @@ vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(struct virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	return n_cpl;
> +	return nr_cpl_pkts;
>   }
>   
>   uint16_t
>   rte_vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
> -		struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint16_t count)
> +		struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint16_t count, int16_t dma_id,
> +		uint16_t vchan_id)
>   {
>   	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
>   	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> @@ -1905,9 +2049,20 @@ rte_vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> -	rte_spinlock_lock(&vq->access_lock);
> +	if (unlikely(!dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans ||
> +				!dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id].pkts_cmpl_flag_addr)) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "(%s) %s: invalid DMA %d vChannel %u.\n", dev->ifname, __func__,
> +			       dma_id, vchan_id);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>   
> -	n_pkts_cpl = vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(dev, queue_id, pkts, count);
> +	if (!rte_spinlock_trylock(&vq->access_lock)) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_DATA(DEBUG, "(%s) failed to poll completed packets from queue id %u. "
> +			"virtqueue busy.\n", dev->ifname, queue_id);

Please try to make it shorter so that the string fits in a single line.

> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	n_pkts_cpl = vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(dev, queue_id, pkts, count, dma_id, vchan_id);
>   
>   	rte_spinlock_unlock(&vq->access_lock);
>   
> @@ -1916,7 +2071,8 @@ rte_vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>   
>   uint16_t
>   rte_vhost_clear_queue_thread_unsafe(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
> -		struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint16_t count)
> +		struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint16_t count, int16_t dma_id,
> +		uint16_t vchan_id)
>   {
>   	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
>   	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> @@ -1940,14 +2096,21 @@ rte_vhost_clear_queue_thread_unsafe(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> -	n_pkts_cpl = vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(dev, queue_id, pkts, count);
> +	if (unlikely(!dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans ||
> +				!dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id].pkts_cmpl_flag_addr)) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "(%s) %s: invalid DMA %d vChannel %u.\n", dev->ifname, __func__,
> +				dma_id, vchan_id);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	n_pkts_cpl = vhost_poll_enqueue_completed(dev, queue_id, pkts, count, dma_id, vchan_id);
>   
>   	return n_pkts_cpl;
>   }
>   
>   static __rte_always_inline uint32_t
>   virtio_dev_rx_async_submit(struct virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> -	struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint32_t count)
> +	struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint32_t count, int16_t dma_id, uint16_t vchan_id)
>   {
>   	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
>   	uint32_t nb_tx = 0;
> @@ -1959,6 +2122,13 @@ virtio_dev_rx_async_submit(struct virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (unlikely(!dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans ||
> +				!dma_copy_track[dma_id].vchans[vchan_id].pkts_cmpl_flag_addr)) {
> +		VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR, "(%s) %s: invalid DMA %d vChannel %u.\n", dev->ifname, __func__,
> +			       dma_id, vchan_id);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	vq = dev->virtqueue[queue_id];
>   
>   	rte_spinlock_lock(&vq->access_lock);
> @@ -1979,10 +2149,10 @@ virtio_dev_rx_async_submit(struct virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>   
>   	if (vq_is_packed(dev))
>   		nb_tx = virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_packed(dev, vq, queue_id,
> -				pkts, count);
> +				pkts, count, dma_id, vchan_id);
>   	else
>   		nb_tx = virtio_dev_rx_async_submit_split(dev, vq, queue_id,
> -				pkts, count);
> +				pkts, count, dma_id, vchan_id);
>   
>   out:
>   	if (dev->features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM))
> @@ -1996,7 +2166,8 @@ virtio_dev_rx_async_submit(struct virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>   
>   uint16_t
>   rte_vhost_submit_enqueue_burst(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
> -		struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint16_t count)
> +		struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint16_t count, int16_t dma_id,
> +		uint16_t vchan_id)
>   {
>   	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
>   
> @@ -2009,7 +2180,7 @@ rte_vhost_submit_enqueue_burst(int vid, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> -	return virtio_dev_rx_async_submit(dev, queue_id, pkts, count);
> +	return virtio_dev_rx_async_submit(dev, queue_id, pkts, count, dma_id, vchan_id);
>   }
>   
>   static inline bool

Overall, it looks good to me, only cosmetic issues to be fixed.
It is too late for -rc1, but please send a new version and I'll pick it
it for -rc2.

Thanks,
Maxime


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-22 10:54 [RFC 0/1] integrate dmadev in vhost Jiayu Hu
2021-11-22 10:54 ` [RFC 1/1] vhost: integrate dmadev in asynchronous datapath Jiayu Hu
2021-12-24 10:39   ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-12-28  1:15     ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-01-03 10:26       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-01-06  5:46         ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-12-03  3:49 ` [RFC 0/1] integrate dmadev in vhost fengchengwen
2021-12-30 21:55 ` [PATCH v1 " Jiayu Hu
2021-12-30 21:55   ` [PATCH v1 1/1] vhost: integrate dmadev in asynchronous datapath Jiayu Hu
2021-12-31  0:55     ` Liang Ma
2022-01-14  6:30     ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-01-17  5:39       ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-01-19  2:18         ` Xia, Chenbo
2022-01-20 17:00     ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-01-21  1:56       ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-01-24 16:40   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] integrate dmadev in vhost Jiayu Hu
2022-01-24 16:40     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] vhost: integrate dmadev in asynchronous datapath Jiayu Hu
2022-02-03 13:04       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-02-07  1:34         ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-02-08 10:40       ` [PATCH v3 0/1] integrate dmadev in vhost Jiayu Hu
2022-02-08 10:40         ` [PATCH v3 1/1] vhost: integrate dmadev in asynchronous data-path Jiayu Hu
2022-02-08 17:46           ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2022-02-09 12:51           ` [PATCH v4 0/1] integrate dmadev in vhost Jiayu Hu
2022-02-09 12:51             ` [PATCH v4 1/1] vhost: integrate dmadev in asynchronous data-path Jiayu Hu
2022-02-10  7:58               ` Yang, YvonneX
2022-02-10 13:44               ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-02-10 15:14               ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-02-10 20:50               ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 21:01                 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-02-10 20:56               ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 21:00                 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2b1ef43-bd67-e578-aad3-6f412deff39f@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=cheng1.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=liangma@liangbit.com \
    --cc=sunil.pai.g@intel.com \
    --cc=xuan.ding@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).