From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FA52C4D for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:18:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2016 07:18:33 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,340,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="179472191" Received: from dhunt5-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.51]) ([10.237.221.51]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2016 07:18:33 -0700 To: Thomas Monjalon , "O'Driscoll, Tim" References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA675F11C5@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <1998191.9HGrB6oKr3@xps13> Cc: dev@dpdk.org From: "Hunt, David" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:18:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1998191.9HGrB6oKr3@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 17.02 Roadmap X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:18:34 -0000 Hi Thomas, On 10/10/2016 9:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Thanks Tim for the interesting inputs. > Some of them may require a dedicated thread to continue the discussion > based on some preliminary specifications or drafts. > > 2016-10-10 16:13, O'Driscoll, Tim: >> Packet Distributor Enhancements: Enhancements will be made to the Packet Distributor library to improve performance: >> 1. Introduce burst functionality to allow batches of packets to be sent to workers. >> 2. Improve the performance of the flow/core affinity through the use of SSE/AVX instructions. > The packet distributor looks more and more like a DPDK application > at the same level of BESS, VPP, OVS, etc. Lets discuss this further. Would you see other libraries heading in this direction also (reorder, acl, hash, etc)? Do you think it would be an idea to add as an item of discussion for the technical steering group when we're all at Userspace next week? Regards, Dave.