DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Simei Su <simei.su@intel.com>,
	thomas@monjalon.net, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
	kirill.rybalchenko@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, wenjun1.wu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/3] add frequency adjustment support for PTP timesync
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 20:44:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9d4859f-b585-609d-0088-552f5fe2cfcf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230522132332.102030-1-simei.su@intel.com>

On 5/22/2023 2:23 PM, Simei Su wrote:
> This patchset cover below parts:
> (1)Introduce a new timesync API called "rte_eth_timesync_adjust_freq" that
>    enables frequency adjustment during PTP timesync. This new API aligns with
>    the kernel PTP which already supports frequency adjustment. It brings DPDK
>    closer in alignment with the kernel's best practice.
> 

Hi Simei,

I am not expert on PTP, so please help me understand,

I can see there is a new API to update device frequency by updating
device clock, 'rte_eth_timesync_adjust_fine()', that part is OK.
(Although I have some reservation with the API name, we can visit it later.)

PTP doesn't enforce any specific sync method, right?
Like adjusting by adding/subtracting or adjusting by updating clock
frequency.
As far as I understand updating device clock frequency is HW capability
to adjust time, perhaps in a finer grain, is this correct?

If so, is this HW capability should be exposed to user with a new API?
If this is a generic HW capability, I think it is OK to have single
responsibility API, but if this is a vendor specific feature it should
be behind a generic API.


Or should we hide this capability behind existing
'rte_eth_timesync_adjust_time()' API, and HW/driver use best possible
method for synchronization, so this can be transparent the user.
What is the benefit to make user selected explicitly one option or other?



> (2)Refine the ptpclient application by applying a PI algorithm that leverages
>    the new API to further improve timesync accuracy. These changes doesn't break
>    original solution and creates a more accurate solution for DPDK-based high
>    accuracy PTP. We have provided significant improvements for timesync accuracy
>    on e810 and we believe these improvements will also benefit other devices.
> 

What is "PI algorithm"? and what PI stands for?

> The original command for starting ptpclient is:
> ./build/examples/dpdk-ptpclient -a 0000:81:00.0 -c 1 -n 3 -- -T 0 -p 0x1
> 
> The command with PI algorithm is:
> ./build/examples/dpdk-ptpclient -a 0000:81:00.0 -c 1 -n 3 -- -T 0 -p 0x1 -- controller=pi
> 
> [RFC v3 1/3] ethdev: add frequency adjustment API.
> [RFC v3 2/3] examples/ptpclient: refine application.
> [RFC v3 3/3] examples/ptpclient: add frequency adjustment support.
> 
> v3:
> * Refine commit log in patch.
> * Add more description for the new API.
> 
> v2:
> * Remove the ice PMD part from the RFC.
> * Add description in cover letter.
> * Refine commit log in patch.
> 
> Simei Su (3):
>   ethdev: add frequency adjustment API
>   examples/ptpclient: refine application
>   examples/ptpclient: add frequency adjustment support
> 
>  examples/ptpclient/ptpclient.c   | 222 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h       |   5 +
>  lib/ethdev/ethdev_trace.h        |   9 ++
>  lib/ethdev/ethdev_trace_points.c |   3 +
>  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c          |  19 ++++
>  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h          |  38 +++++++
>  6 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-02 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-31  2:22 [RFC 0/4] add frequency adjustment support for PTP Simei Su
2023-03-31  2:22 ` [RFC 1/4] ethdev: add frequency adjustment API Simei Su
2023-03-31  2:22 ` [RFC 2/4] net/ice: add frequency adjustment support for PTP Simei Su
2023-03-31  2:22 ` [RFC 3/4] examples/ptpclient: refine application Simei Su
2023-03-31  2:22 ` [RFC 4/4] examples/ptpclient: add frequency adjustment support Simei Su
2023-04-03  9:22 ` [RFC v2 0/3] add frequency adjustment support for PTP timesync Simei Su
2023-04-03  9:22   ` [RFC v2 1/3] ethdev: add frequency adjustment API Simei Su
2023-05-15 14:18     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-24  9:25       ` Su, Simei
2023-04-03  9:22   ` [RFC v2 2/3] examples/ptpclient: refine application Simei Su
2023-04-03  9:22   ` [RFC v2 3/3] examples/ptpclient: add frequency adjustment support Simei Su
2023-05-22 13:23   ` [RFC v3 0/3] add frequency adjustment support for PTP timesync Simei Su
2023-05-22 13:23     ` [RFC v3 1/3] ethdev: add frequency adjustment API Simei Su
2023-05-22 13:23     ` [RFC v3 2/3] examples/ptpclient: refine application Simei Su
2023-06-02 19:45       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-05-22 13:23     ` [RFC v3 3/3] examples/ptpclient: add frequency adjustment support Simei Su
2023-06-02 19:52       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-07 10:04         ` Su, Simei
2023-06-02 19:44     ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2023-06-07  8:19       ` [RFC v3 0/3] add frequency adjustment support for PTP timesync Su, Simei
2023-06-07 18:29         ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-08  4:05           ` Su, Simei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c9d4859f-b585-609d-0088-552f5fe2cfcf@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=kirill.rybalchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=simei.su@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wenjun1.wu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).