DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/3] fbarray: rework find_next_n to flatten the loop
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:29:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb04b3ee9392b9930801d2c400f1e64645ba7003.1724405387.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47e02f706d284a2e2a49db51ce75081e62aee393.1724405387.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

Currently, find_next_n() is implemented as a nested loop due to lookahead
functionality. This is not very efficient because when doing lookahead,
we essentially scan some of the indices twice, and in general the lookahead
functionality has been a source of bugs because it is overcomplicated.
The bit ignore feature on lookahead is also unnecessary because we don't really
win anything by ignoring bits we have already scanned, as they would not trigger
any matches anyway.

This patch reworks find_next_n() to flatten the loop and remove the lookahead
and bit-ignore functionality, instead replacing it with state machine-like
behavior. This makes the code simpler to reason about.

Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
---
 lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c | 195 +++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c
index 22b43073c6..d38a43d8d1 100644
--- a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c
+++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c
@@ -117,9 +117,11 @@ find_next_n(const struct rte_fbarray *arr, unsigned int start, unsigned int n,
 {
 	const struct used_mask *msk = get_used_mask(arr->data, arr->elt_sz,
 			arr->len);
-	unsigned int msk_idx, lookahead_idx, first, first_mod;
+	unsigned int msk_idx, first, first_mod;
 	unsigned int last, last_mod;
-	uint64_t last_msk, ignore_msk;
+	uint64_t last_msk, first_msk;
+	unsigned int run_start, left = 0;
+	bool run_started = false;
 
 	/*
 	 * mask only has granularity of MASK_ALIGN, but start may not be aligned
@@ -128,7 +130,7 @@ find_next_n(const struct rte_fbarray *arr, unsigned int start, unsigned int n,
 	 */
 	first = MASK_LEN_TO_IDX(start);
 	first_mod = MASK_LEN_TO_MOD(start);
-	ignore_msk = ~((1ULL << first_mod) - 1);
+	first_msk = ~((1ULL << first_mod) - 1);
 
 	/* array length may not be aligned, so calculate ignore mask for last
 	 * mask index.
@@ -137,131 +139,120 @@ find_next_n(const struct rte_fbarray *arr, unsigned int start, unsigned int n,
 	last_mod = MASK_LEN_TO_MOD(arr->len);
 	last_msk = ~(UINT64_MAX << last_mod);
 
+	left = n;
+
 	for (msk_idx = first; msk_idx < msk->n_masks; msk_idx++) {
-		uint64_t cur_msk, lookahead_msk;
-		unsigned int run_start, clz, left;
-		bool found = false;
+		unsigned int s_idx, clz, need;
+		uint64_t cur_msk, tmp_msk;
+
 		/*
-		 * The process of getting n consecutive bits for arbitrary n is
-		 * a bit involved, but here it is in a nutshell:
+		 * In order to find N consecutive bits for arbitrary N, we need
+		 * to be aware of the following:
 		 *
-		 *  1. let n be the number of consecutive bits we're looking for
-		 *  2. check if n can fit in one mask, and if so, do n-1
-		 *     rshift-ands to see if there is an appropriate run inside
-		 *     our current mask
-		 *    2a. if we found a run, bail out early
-		 *    2b. if we didn't find a run, proceed
-		 *  3. invert the mask and count leading zeroes (that is, count
-		 *     how many consecutive set bits we had starting from the
-		 *     end of current mask) as k
-		 *    3a. if k is 0, continue to next mask
-		 *    3b. if k is not 0, we have a potential run
-		 *  4. to satisfy our requirements, next mask must have n-k
-		 *     consecutive set bits right at the start, so we will do
-		 *     (n-k-1) rshift-ands and check if first bit is set.
+		 *  1. To find N number of consecutive bits within a mask, we
+		 *     need to do N-1 rshift-ands and see if we still have set
+		 *     bits anywhere in the mask
+		 *  2. N may be larger than mask size, in which case we need to
+		 *     do a search in multiple consecutive masks
+		 *  3. For multi-mask search to be meaningful, we need to anchor
+		 *     our searches, i.e. first we find a run of M bits at the
+		 *     end of current mask, then we look for N-M bits at the
+		 *     beginning of next mask (or multiple masks)
 		 *
-		 * Step 4 will need to be repeated if (n-k) > MASK_ALIGN until
-		 * we either run out of masks, lose the run, or find what we
-		 * were looking for.
+		 * With all of the above, the algorihm looks as follows:
+		 *
+		 *  1. let N be the number of consecutive bits we're looking for
+		 *  2. if we already started a run, check if we can continue it
+		 *     by looking for remainder of N at the beginning of current
+		 *     mask
+		 *  3. if we lost a run or if we never had a run, we look for N
+		 *     bits anywhere within the current mask (up to mask size,
+		 *     we can finish this run in the next mask if N > mask size)
+		 *  4. if we didn't find anything up to this point, check if any
+		 *     topmost bits of the mask are set (meaning we can start a
+		 *     run and finish it in the next mask)
+		 *  5. at any point in steps 2-4, we may do an early exit due to
+		 *     finding what we were looking for, or continue searching
+		 *     further
 		 */
 		cur_msk = msk->data[msk_idx];
-		left = n;
 
 		/* if we're looking for free spaces, invert the mask */
 		if (!used)
 			cur_msk = ~cur_msk;
 
-		/* combine current ignore mask with last index ignore mask */
+		/* first and last mask may not be aligned */
+		if (msk_idx == first)
+			cur_msk &= first_msk;
 		if (msk_idx == last)
-			ignore_msk &= last_msk;
+			cur_msk &= last_msk;
 
-		/* if we have an ignore mask, ignore once */
-		if (ignore_msk) {
-			cur_msk &= ignore_msk;
-			ignore_msk = 0;
-		}
+		/* do we have an active previous run? */
+		if (run_started) {
+			/* figure out how many consecutive bits we need here */
+			need = RTE_MIN(left, MASK_ALIGN);
 
-		/* if n can fit in within a single mask, do a search */
-		if (n <= MASK_ALIGN) {
-			uint64_t tmp_msk = cur_msk;
-			unsigned int s_idx;
-			for (s_idx = 0; s_idx < n - 1; s_idx++)
+			/* see if we get a run of needed length */
+			tmp_msk = cur_msk;
+			for (s_idx = 0; s_idx < need - 1; s_idx++)
 				tmp_msk &= tmp_msk >> 1ULL;
-			/* we found what we were looking for */
-			if (tmp_msk != 0) {
-				run_start = rte_ctz64(tmp_msk);
-				return MASK_GET_IDX(msk_idx, run_start);
+
+			/* if first bit is set, we keep the run */
+			if (tmp_msk & 1) {
+				left -= need;
+
+				/* did we find what we were looking for? */
+				if (left == 0)
+					return run_start;
+
+				/* keep looking */
+				continue;
 			}
+			/* we lost the run, reset */
+			run_started = false;
+			left = n;
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * we didn't find our run within the mask, or n > MASK_ALIGN,
-		 * so we're going for plan B.
-		 */
+		/* if we're here, we either lost the run or never had it */
+
+		/* figure out how many consecutive bits we need here */
+		need = RTE_MIN(left, MASK_ALIGN);
+
+		/* do a search */
+		tmp_msk = cur_msk;
+		for (s_idx = 0; s_idx < need - 1; s_idx++)
+			tmp_msk &= tmp_msk >> 1ULL;
+
+		/* have we found something? */
+		if (tmp_msk != 0) {
+			/* figure out where the run started */
+			run_start = MASK_GET_IDX(msk_idx, rte_ctz64(tmp_msk));
+			run_started = true;
+			left -= need;
+
+			/* do we need to look further? */
+			if (left == 0)
+				return run_start;
+
+			/* we need to keep looking */
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* we didn't find our run within current mask, go for plan B. */
 
 		/* count leading zeroes on inverted mask */
-		if (~cur_msk == 0)
-			clz = sizeof(cur_msk) * 8;
-		else
-			clz = rte_clz64(~cur_msk);
+		clz = rte_clz64(~cur_msk);
 
-		/* if there aren't any runs at the end either, just continue */
+		/* if there aren't any set bits at the end, just continue */
 		if (clz == 0)
 			continue;
 
-		/* we have a partial run at the end, so try looking ahead */
-		run_start = MASK_ALIGN - clz;
+		/* we have a partial run at the end */
+		run_start = MASK_GET_IDX(msk_idx, MASK_ALIGN - clz);
+		run_started = true;
 		left -= clz;
 
-		for (lookahead_idx = msk_idx + 1; lookahead_idx < msk->n_masks;
-				lookahead_idx++) {
-			unsigned int s_idx, need;
-			uint64_t first_bit = 1;
-
-			lookahead_msk = msk->data[lookahead_idx];
-
-			/* if we're looking for free space, invert the mask */
-			if (!used)
-				lookahead_msk = ~lookahead_msk;
-
-			/* figure out how many consecutive bits we need here */
-			need = RTE_MIN(left, MASK_ALIGN);
-
-			/* count number of shifts we performed */
-			for (s_idx = 0; s_idx < need - 1; s_idx++) {
-				lookahead_msk &= lookahead_msk >> 1ULL;
-				/* did we lose the run yet? */
-				if ((lookahead_msk & first_bit) == 0)
-					break;
-			}
-
-			/* if first bit is not set, we've lost the run */
-			if ((lookahead_msk & first_bit) == 0) {
-				/*
-				 * we've scanned this far, so we know there are
-				 * no runs in the space we've lookahead-scanned
-				 * as well, so skip that on next iteration.
-				 */
-				ignore_msk = ~((1ULL << (s_idx + 1)) - 1);
-				/* outer loop will increment msk_idx so add 1 */
-				msk_idx = lookahead_idx - 1;
-				break;
-			}
-
-			left -= need;
-
-			/* check if we've found what we were looking for */
-			if (left == 0) {
-				found = true;
-				break;
-			}
-		}
-
-		/* we didn't find anything, so continue */
-		if (!found)
-			continue;
-
-		return MASK_GET_IDX(msk_idx, run_start);
+		/* we'll figure this out in the next iteration */
 	}
 	/* we didn't find anything */
 	rte_errno = used ? ENOENT : ENOSPC;
-- 
2.43.5


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-23  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-23  9:29 [PATCH v1 1/3] fbarray: rename tests to be more meaningful Anatoly Burakov
2024-08-23  9:29 ` Anatoly Burakov [this message]
2024-08-23  9:29 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] fbarray: rework find_prev_n to flatten the loop Anatoly Burakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb04b3ee9392b9930801d2c400f1e64645ba7003.1724405387.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).