DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	huangdaode <huangdaode@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] net/hns3: fix inconsistent enabled RSS behavior
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:05:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb87af2a-e625-db95-26a9-784f7b13059d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8080441.NyiUUSuA9g@thomas>


在 2022/3/23 1:13, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
> 21/03/2022 08:14, lihuisong (C):
>> 2022/3/10 16:08, lihuisong (C):
>>> 2022/3/9 17:55, Ori Kam:
>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>> 2022/3/3 10:47, lihuisong (C):
>>>>>> 2022/3/2 22:07, Ori Kam:
>>>>>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>>>>> 2022/3/1 0:42, Ferruh Yigit:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/28/2022 3:21 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> RSS will not be enabled if the RTE_ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG isn't be
>>>>>>>>>> set in
>>>>>>>>>> dev_configure phase. However, if this flag isn't set, RSS can be
>>>>>>>>>> enabled
>>>>>>>>>> through the ethdev ops and rte_flow API. This behavior is
>>>>>>>>>> contrary to
>>>>>>>>>> each
>>>>>>>>>> other.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes: c37ca66f2b27 ("net/hns3: support RSS")
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Huisong, Connor,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let's get a little more feedback for this patch, cc'ed more people.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To enable RSS, multi queue mode should be set to
>>>>>>>>> 'RTE_ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG'.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But I wonder if it is required to configure RSS via flow API,
>>>>>>>> I do not know the original purpose of adding the RSS
>>>>>>>> configuration in
>>>>>>>> flow API.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The purpose is simple, this allow to create RSS per rule and not a
>>>>>>> global one.
>>>>>>> For example create RSS that sends TCP to some queues while othe RSS
>>>>>>> will send
>>>>>>> UDP traffic to different queues.
>>>>>> I'm a little confused now. The "per rule" also seems to be a global
>>>>>> configuration.
>>>>>> Example:
>>>>>>    - start PMD with 0,1,2,3
>>>>>>    - create TCP packets to 2,3 queues. At this moment, only 2,3 queues
>>>>>> can be received for other types of packets.
>>>>>> Because this rule is implemented by modifying the entry of the
>>>>>> redirection table which is global for this device.
>>>>> Hi, Ori and Stephen.
>>>>> Can you help me clear up the confusion above? If some NICs behave like
>>>>> this, what should we do about it?
>>>> I'm not sure I understand the issue, maybe it is releated to some
>>>> HW/PMD limitation.
>>>> In your example non TCP traffic will be routed to one of the 4 queues
>>>> (0,1,2,3),
>>>> While TCP traffic will only be routed to queues 2,3.
>>>>
>>>> Now I can add new rule that matches on UDP packet and RSS to queue 0
>>>> and 3 in this case:
>>>> TCP packets will be routed to queues 0,3.
>>>> UDP packets will be routed to queues 2,3.
>>>> All the rest of the traffic will be routed to queues 0,1,2,3
>>>>
>>>> And just to be clear if now I add a rule to match all packets in
>>>> higher priority,
>>>> with RSS to queues 1,2. Then all traffic will be routed to queues 1,2.
>>>>
>>>> At least this is what is expected, from API point of view.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Ori
>>> Thank you for your answer. I understand it.
>>> hns3 PMD cannot implement the above functions due to hardware limitation.
>>> we may need add a check that specified RSS queues cannot be supported
>>> when specified packets types.
>>> And only the packet type is specified, which meets the requirements of
>>> rte_flow API.
>>> The check for the RTE_ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG flag in rte_flow is not correct.
>>> Thanks, Ori and Stephen😁
>>>
>>> But, I think, it is necessary for the '.rss_hash_update' and
>>> '.reta_update' APIs
>>> in eth_dev_ops to verify this flag. What do you think? @Thomas,
>>> @Ferruh, @Ori and @Stephen.
>> What's your take on it? I am looking forward to your reply. Thanks!
> I am not sure why you want to check this flag.
I want to make sure that the behavior that PMD configured RSS is
consistent across different interfaces. The RTE_ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG
flag is a switch to enable RSS hash. If the switch isn't open, some
PMD do not configure RSS function. I think the consistency is necessary.
If not set RSS muti-queue mode, it is unnecessary to configure RSS.
> I can imagine we configure the hash and the table before enabling RSS
> with the RTE_ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG flag.
The flag is derived from dev_configure() which also configures
hash and key. I don't think it makes sense to configure hash and
reta before calling dev_configure. Because they'll be updated.
This is similar to configuring mtu.
>
>
> .

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-23  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-28  3:21 [PATCH 0/6] bugfixes for hns3 PMD Min Hu (Connor)
2022-02-28  3:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] net/hns3: remove duplicate macro definition Min Hu (Connor)
2022-02-28 17:46   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-03-02 11:22     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-28  3:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] net/hns3: fix inconsistent enabled RSS behavior Min Hu (Connor)
2022-02-28 16:42   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-03-02  2:09     ` lihuisong (C)
2022-03-02 14:07       ` Ori Kam
2022-03-02 14:46         ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-03-02 16:59           ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-03-03  2:48             ` lihuisong (C)
2022-03-24  7:16             ` Harold Huang
2022-03-03  2:47         ` lihuisong (C)
2022-03-09  8:03           ` lihuisong (C)
2022-03-09  9:55             ` Ori Kam
2022-03-10  8:08               ` lihuisong (C)
2022-03-21  7:14                 ` lihuisong (C)
2022-03-22 17:13                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-03-23  3:05                     ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2022-03-23  9:14                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-03-23 11:04                         ` lihuisong (C)
2022-03-23 19:04                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-03-23 19:50                             ` Ajit Khaparde
2022-03-24 12:44                               ` lihuisong (C)
2022-05-12 14:13               ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-28  3:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] net/hns3: remove unnecessary RSS switch Min Hu (Connor)
2022-02-28  3:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] net/hns3: fix the time waiting for PF reset completion Min Hu (Connor)
2022-02-28 17:09   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-03-01  6:32     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-03-01 10:44       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-03-02  0:35   ` [PATCH v2] " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-03-02 11:48     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-28  3:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] net/hns3: fix RSS TC mode entry Min Hu (Connor)
2022-02-28  3:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] net/hns3: fix VF " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-06  6:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fix RSS bugs Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-06  6:57   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: fix enabling RSS behavior inconsistent Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-12 14:13     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-04-06  6:57   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/hns3: remove unnecessary RSS switch Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-12 14:13   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fix RSS bugs Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb87af2a-e625-db95-26a9-784f7b13059d@huawei.com \
    --to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=huangdaode@huawei.com \
    --cc=humin29@huawei.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).