DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rao, Nikhil" <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
To: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>,
	jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com,
	santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com,
	anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Rao, Nikhil" <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/test-eventdev: add Tx adapter support
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:07:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbc47729-07d1-d464-45e9-4cd8d20081ec@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180831104040.26678-2-pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>

Hi Pavan,

Few comments below.

On 8/31/2018 4:10 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
> Convert existing Tx service based pipeline to Tx adapter based APIs and
> simplify worker functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
>   app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_atq.c    | 216 +++++++++++---------
>   app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.c | 193 ++++++------------
>   app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.h |  43 ++--
>   app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_queue.c  | 238 ++++++++++++-----------
>   4 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 368 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_atq.c b/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_atq.c
</snip>
> -static int
> +static __rte_noinline int
>   pipeline_atq_worker_multi_stage_burst_fwd(void *arg)
>   {
>   	PIPELINE_WORKER_MULTI_STAGE_BURST_INIT;
> -	const uint8_t nb_stages = t->opt->nb_stages;
> -	const uint8_t tx_queue = t->tx_service.queue_id;
> +	const uint8_t *tx_queue = t->tx_evqueue_id;
>   
>   	while (t->done == false) {
>   		uint16_t nb_rx = rte_event_dequeue_burst(dev, port, ev,
> @@ -253,9 +235,10 @@ pipeline_atq_worker_multi_stage_burst_fwd(void *arg)
>   
>   			if (cq_id == last_queue) {
>   				w->processed_pkts++;
> -				ev[i].queue_id = tx_queue;
> +				ev[i].queue_id = tx_queue[ev[i].mbuf->port];
>   				pipeline_fwd_event(&ev[i],
>   						RTE_SCHED_TYPE_ATOMIC);
> +
Unintentional newline ?
>   			} else {
>   				ev[i].sub_event_type++;
>   				pipeline_fwd_event(&ev[i],
>   static int
>   
> @@ -317,23 +296,25 @@ pipeline_atq_eventdev_setup(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt)
>   	int nb_ports;
>   	int nb_queues;
>   	uint8_t queue;
> -	struct rte_event_dev_info info;
> -	struct test_pipeline *t = evt_test_priv(test);
> -	uint8_t tx_evqueue_id = 0;
> +	uint8_t tx_evqueue_id[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS] = {0};
>   	uint8_t queue_arr[RTE_EVENT_MAX_QUEUES_PER_DEV];
>   	uint8_t nb_worker_queues = 0;
> +	uint8_t tx_evport_id = 0;
> +	uint16_t prod = 0;
> +	struct rte_event_dev_info info;
> +	struct test_pipeline *t = evt_test_priv(test);
>   
>   	nb_ports = evt_nr_active_lcores(opt->wlcores);
>   	nb_queues = rte_eth_dev_count_avail();
>   
> -	/* One extra port and queueu for Tx service */
> -	if (t->mt_unsafe) {
> -		tx_evqueue_id = nb_queues;
> -		nb_ports++;
> -		nb_queues++;
> +	/* One queue for Tx service */
> +	if (!t->internal_port) {
See comment about struct test_pipeline::internal_port in the 
test_pipeline_common.h review below.

> +		RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(prod) {
> +			tx_evqueue_id[prod] = nb_queues;
> +			nb_queues++;
> +		}
>   	}
>   
>   
> @@ -388,14 +371,11 @@ pipeline_atq_eventdev_setup(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt)
>   			.new_event_threshold = info.max_num_events,
>   	};
>   
> -	if (t->mt_unsafe) {
> +	if (!t->internal_port) {
>   		ret = pipeline_event_port_setup(test, opt, queue_arr,
>   				nb_worker_queues, p_conf);
>   		if (ret)
>   			return ret;
> -
> -		ret = pipeline_event_tx_service_setup(test, opt, tx_evqueue_id,
> -				nb_ports - 1, p_conf);
>   	} else
>   		ret = pipeline_event_port_setup(test, opt, NULL, nb_queues,
>   				p_conf);
> @@ -424,14 +404,17 @@ pipeline_atq_eventdev_setup(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt)
>   	 *	stride = 1
>   	 *
>   	 *	event queue pipelines:
> -	 *	eth0 -> q0
> -	 *		  } (q3->tx) Tx service
> -	 *	eth1 -> q1
> +	 *	eth0 -> q0 \
> +	 *		    q3->tx
> +	 *	eth1 -> q1 /
>   	 *
>   	 *	q0,q1 are configured as stated above.
>   	 *	q3 configured as SINGLE_LINK|ATOMIC.
>   	 */
>   	ret = pipeline_event_rx_adapter_setup(opt, 1, p_conf);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = pipeline_event_tx_adapter_setup(opt, p_conf);
pipeline_event_tx_adapter_setup() creates a tx adapter per eth port, 
that doesn't match the preceding diagram.

>   
> diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.c b/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.c
> index a54068df3..7f858e23f 100644
> --- a/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.c
> +++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.c
> @@ -5,58 +5,6 @@
>
</snip>

> @@ -215,7 +160,6 @@ pipeline_ethdev_setup(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt)
>   {
>   	uint16_t i;
>   	uint8_t nb_queues = 1;
> -	uint8_t mt_state = 0;
>   	struct test_pipeline *t = evt_test_priv(test);
>   	struct rte_eth_rxconf rx_conf;
>   	struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
> @@ -238,13 +182,13 @@ pipeline_ethdev_setup(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   	}
>   
> +	t->internal_port = 0;
>   	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i) {
>   		struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
>   		struct rte_eth_conf local_port_conf = port_conf;
> +		uint32_t caps = 0;
>   
>   		rte_eth_dev_info_get(i, &dev_info);
> -		mt_state = !(dev_info.tx_offload_capa &
> -				DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE);
>   		rx_conf = dev_info.default_rxconf;
>   		rx_conf.offloads = port_conf.rxmode.offloads;
>   
> @@ -279,11 +223,9 @@ pipeline_ethdev_setup(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt)
>   			return -EINVAL;
>   		}
>   
> -		t->mt_unsafe |= mt_state;
> -		t->tx_service.tx_buf[i] =
> -			rte_malloc(NULL, RTE_ETH_TX_BUFFER_SIZE(BURST_SIZE), 0);
> -		if (t->tx_service.tx_buf[i] == NULL)
> -			rte_panic("Unable to allocate Tx buffer memory.");
> +		rte_event_eth_tx_adapter_caps_get(opt->dev_id, i, &caps);
> +		if ((caps & RTE_EVENT_ETH_TX_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT))
> +			t->internal_port = 1;See comment about struct test_pipeline::internal_port below
>   		rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(i);
>   	}
>   
> @@ -295,7 +237,6 @@ pipeline_event_port_setup(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt,
>   		uint8_t *queue_arr, uint8_t nb_queues,
>   		const struct rte_event_port_conf p_conf)
>   {
> -	int i;
>   	int ret;
>   	uint8_t port;
>   	struct test_pipeline *t = evt_test_priv(test);
> @@ -321,10 +262,9 @@ pipeline_event_port_setup(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt,
>   						0) != nb_queues)
>   				goto link_fail;
>   		} else {
> -			for (i = 0; i < nb_queues; i++) {
> -				if (rte_event_port_link(opt->dev_id, port,
> -						&queue_arr[i], NULL, 1) != 1)
> -					goto link_fail;
> +			if (rte_event_port_link(opt->dev_id, port, queue_arr,
> +					NULL, nb_queues) != nb_queues) {
> +				goto link_fail;
>   			}
Minor, isn't it possible to replace the if (queue_arr == NULL) {} else 
{}  block with a single call to rte_event_port_link() ?

>   
> diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.h b/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.h
> index 9cd6b905b..b8939db81 100644
> --- a/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.h
> +++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_common.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>   #include <rte_ethdev.h>
>   #include <rte_eventdev.h>
>   #include <rte_event_eth_rx_adapter.h>
> +#include <rte_event_eth_tx_adapter.h>
>   #include <rte_lcore.h>
>   #include <rte_malloc.h>
>   #include <rte_mempool.h>
> @@ -26,6 +27,9 @@
>   #include "evt_options.h"
>   #include "evt_test.h"
>   
> +#define PIPELINE_TX_ADPTR_ENQ 0x1
> +#define PIPELINE_TX_ADPTR_FWD 0x2
> +
I don't see a reference to these defines.

>   struct test_pipeline;
>   
>   struct worker_data {
> @@ -35,30 +39,19 @@ struct worker_data {
>   	struct test_pipeline *t;
>   } __rte_cache_aligned;
>   
> -struct tx_service_data {
> -	uint8_t dev_id;
> -	uint8_t queue_id;
> -	uint8_t port_id;
> -	uint32_t service_id;
> -	uint64_t processed_pkts;
> -	uint16_t nb_ethports;
> -	struct rte_eth_dev_tx_buffer *tx_buf[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> -	struct test_pipeline *t;
> -} __rte_cache_aligned;
> -
>   struct test_pipeline {
>   	/* Don't change the offset of "done". Signal handler use this memory
>   	 * to terminate all lcores work.
>   	 */
>   	int done;
>   	uint8_t nb_workers;
> -	uint8_t mt_unsafe;
Can we also replace references to mt_unsafe in comments ?

> +	uint8_t internal_port;
Shouldn't internal_port be a per eth device flag ? Or is there an 
assumption that all eth devices will be such that the eventdev PMD's 
internal port capability will be set ?


> diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_queue.c b/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_queue.c
> index 2e0d93d99..e1153573b 100644
> --- a/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_queue.c
> +++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_pipeline_queue.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ pipeline_queue_nb_event_queues(struct evt_options *opt)
>   	return (eth_count * opt->nb_stages) + eth_count;
>   }
>   
> -static int
> +static __rte_noinline int
>   pipeline_queue_worker_single_stage_tx(void *arg)
>   {
>   	PIPELINE_WORKER_SINGLE_STAGE_INIT;
> @@ -29,9 +29,12 @@ pipeline_queue_worker_single_stage_tx(void *arg)
>   		}
>   
>   		if (ev.sched_type == RTE_SCHED_TYPE_ATOMIC) {
> -			pipeline_tx_pkt(ev.mbuf);
> +			rte_event_eth_tx_adapter_txq_set(ev.mbuf, 0);
> +			rte_event_eth_tx_adapter_enqueue(dev, port,
> +					&ev, 1);
Do we need a retry loop for enqueue above and at other usages in this 
patch ?

>   			w->processed_pkts++;
>   		} else {
> +
new line is intentional ?
>   			ev.queue_id++;
>   			pipeline_fwd_event(&ev, RTE_SCHED_TYPE_ATOMIC);
>   			pipeline_event_enqueue(dev, port, &ev);
> @@ -41,11 +44,11 @@ pipeline_queue_worker_single_stage_tx(void *arg)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   

Nikhil

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-04  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-31 10:40 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/test-eventdev: fix minor typos Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-08-31 10:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/test-eventdev: add Tx adapter support Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-09-04  5:37   ` Rao, Nikhil [this message]
2018-09-04  8:12     ` Pavan Nikhilesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cbc47729-07d1-d464-45e9-4cd8d20081ec@intel.com \
    --to=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
    --cc=anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).