From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Stillwell Jr, Paul M" <paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Xiao" <xiao.zhang@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [v4] net/i40e: fix SFP X722 not work with FW4.16
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:17:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc3e72ea-70b0-acef-8cc9-c3a97470f75e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F8A4ECA1C1D86B4081DD6BF503D1F436C7529612@fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com>
On 7/19/2019 4:30 PM, Stillwell Jr, Paul M wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Xiao Zhang
>> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 4:00 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue
>> <haiyue.wang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Zhang, Xiao
>> <xiao.zhang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [v4] net/i40e: fix SFP X722 not work with FW4.16
>>
>> The code checked the NVM API version of FW to check if support adminq
>> operation, when version is 1.7 or above adminq operation is support and the
>> adminq flag will be set. The code will use adminq to set TPID if the flags set or
>> to use register. The NVM API version of SFP X722 old versions are lowwer
>> than 1.7 and for FW4.16 is 1.8. But FW4.16 of SFP
>> X722 does not support adminq operation, the legacy logic is not compatible
>> with device SFP X722 currently. Check the device id to unset adminq flag to
>> use resigter setting to make it work.
>>
>
> Sorry, I'm still confused about what this patch is doing. From the commit message it seems like there are a couple of conditions:
>
> If the device is X722
> Then if FW < 1.7 then use register to set TPID
> Else use adminq to set TPID
>
> The change in the code is only looking to see if the device is X722 and not doing any other checking of FW version.
>
> Am I misunderstanding the commit message, the patch, or both?
I have updated the commit log while merging [1] (according what I understand) I
hope it is more clear.
[1]
net/i40e: fix SFP X722 with FW4.16
When NVM API version is 1.7 or above adminq operation to set TPID is
set as supported. This cause using adminq instead of registers.
For SFP X722 FW4.16, reported NVM API version is 1.8, and this cause
adminq operation to set as supported but it is not supported on FW4.16
Additional check added for SFP X722 to not enable adminq operation.
Fixes: 73cd7d6dc8e1 ("net/i40e: use set switch AQ instead of register setting")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Xiao Zhang <xiao.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
>
>> Fixes: 73cd7d6dc8e1 ("net/i40e: use set switch AQ instead of register
>> setting")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Zhang <xiao.zhang@intel.com>
>> ---
>> v4
>> Add more detailed information in the commit log.
>> v3
>> Modify the commit log to make it not confused and add fixed line.
>> v2
>> Unset adminq flag instead of only checking device id when set TPID.
>> v1
>> Check device id when setting TPID, use adminq if not SFP X722, else use
>> register.
>> ---
>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
>> index 2b9fc45..2b2c877 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
>> @@ -1358,6 +1358,10 @@ eth_i40e_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, void
>> *init_params __rte_unused)
>> PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Failed to init adminq: %d", ret);
>> return -EIO;
>> }
>> + /* Firmware of SFP x722 does not support adminq option */
>> + if (hw->device_id == I40E_DEV_ID_SFP_X722)
>> + hw->flags &= ~I40E_HW_FLAG_802_1AD_CAPABLE;
>> +
>> PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "FW %d.%d API %d.%d NVM
>> %02d.%02d.%02d eetrack %04x",
>> hw->aq.fw_maj_ver, hw->aq.fw_min_ver,
>> hw->aq.api_maj_ver, hw->aq.api_min_ver,
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-19 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-18 17:13 [dpdk-dev] [DPDK] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-18 8:23 ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-07-18 8:25 ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-07-18 8:32 ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-07-18 22:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-19 0:56 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-07-19 1:02 ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-07-19 1:14 ` Zhang, Xiao
2019-07-19 10:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [v3] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-19 10:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [v4] " Xiao Zhang
2019-07-19 2:17 ` Wang, Haiyue
2019-07-19 5:26 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-07-19 15:30 ` Stillwell Jr, Paul M
2019-07-19 18:17 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-07-20 0:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Zhang, Xiao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc3e72ea-70b0-acef-8cc9-c3a97470f75e@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
--cc=paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xiao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).